Does density of a medium affect the conservation of momentum?

AI Thread Summary
A body traveling through a less dense medium does not increase its velocity to conserve momentum, as momentum is not conserved in such scenarios due to the presence of resisting forces. Although the resistance may decrease in less dense media, it always opposes the direction of motion, preventing any increase in velocity without an external force. Momentum is conserved overall, as the medium exerts a force on the object that slows it down, while an equal and opposite force acts on the medium's particles. Some of these particles may move in the same direction as the object, carrying away the momentum lost by the object. Thus, while momentum is transferred, the object itself cannot speed up in a less dense medium.
JerryF
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

If a body has a given initial momentum and then travels through a continuously less dense medium would it's velocity increase to conserve momentum?

Thanks
Jerry
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No
 
JerryF said:
Hi all,

If a body has a given initial momentum and then travels through a continuously less dense medium would it's velocity increase to conserve momentum?

Thanks
Jerry
Momentum is typically not conserved for a body moving through a medium, as it will be subject to a resisting force. As it moves to a less dense medium it may decelerate less, but it cannot speed up without an external force to accelerate it.
 
JerryF said:
If a body has a given initial momentum and then travels through a continuously less dense medium would it's velocity increase to conserve momentum?
No.
The resistance from the medium may become less as the medium comes less dense, but that resistance is always opposed to the direction of motion so always acts to slow the object and reduce its momentum.

Momentum is still conserved however. The medium exerts a force on the object to slow it, but by Newton's third law there is an equal and opposite force acting on the particles of the medium. At least some of these end up moving in the same direction that the object was moving, and these carry the momentum that the object lost.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top