Does Distilled Water Boil/Evaporate? Mythbusters Examined

  • Thread starter Thread starter kmbop53
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a Mythbusters episode claiming that distilled water does not boil, which raises questions about its evaporation properties. Participants clarify that the concept of superheating is relevant, explaining that distilled water can indeed boil under certain conditions, especially in smooth containers. The conversation suggests that the show's wording may have implied that distilled water is less likely to boil easily, rather than stating it doesn't boil at all. Additionally, the phenomenon of superheating can lead to explosive boiling when the water is disturbed. Overall, the thread highlights misconceptions about distilled water's boiling and evaporation characteristics.
kmbop53
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A couple of days ago I was watching the show Mythbusters, which I find the experiments to be kind of hokey, but they did an experiment and they stated that distilled water does not boil. Is this true, if so does this mean that it does not evaporate faster when heated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I doubt that they found that distilled water doesn't boil...

Can you find which episode it is from the list on here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythbusters (Scroll down to the very bottom see each season in detail)

Edit: I think what you are thinking of is superheating. If you put water in a very smooth container and microwave it, it will boil because there aren't any places for bubbles to form. Of course as soon as you disturb the liquid, it violently boils.

I guess they were testing to see if distilled water was at a greater risk to superheat than regular tap water.
 
Last edited:
They must have said "Doesn't boil as easily" or something...
 
thanx that's quite interesting, you i think that they were talking about that, after a while it just exploded all over the microvave.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top