Does Earth's Rotation Create Gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill E
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the misconception that Earth's rotation creates gravity, with participants clarifying that gravity is actually a result of an object's mass. It is emphasized that Earth's rotation is not caused by its gravity, but rather, the rotation originated from the angular momentum of the material that formed the planet. Some participants recall being taught the incorrect notion in school, suggesting a broader misunderstanding of the topic. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate scientific education regarding gravity and planetary motion. Overall, the consensus is that gravity is fundamentally linked to mass, not rotation.
Bill E
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In Elementary School, many years ago, we where taught Earths gravity is created because our planet rotates. And if the rotation stopped, we would have no gravity. My present understanding is gravity comes from an objects mass. It seems rotation would be a result of gravity, not the creator of gravity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill E said:
In Elementary School, many years ago, we where taught Earths gravity is created because our planet rotates. And if the rotation stopped, we would have no gravity. My present understanding is gravity comes from an objects mass.
If you were taught that, it is very unfortunate. It is quite wrong. I can't imagine a teacher in the last century actually thinking gravity was caused by rotation. Is it possible that it was just a misunderstanding on your part?

It seems rotation would be a result of gravity, not the creator of gravity.
The rotation of the Earth is not the result of Earth's gravity. There is no general requirement that a mass the size of the Earth must rotate at all.

But, in a way, gravity (of the sun and the solar system) did cause the Earth's' rotation. The rotation of the Earth is the result of the way the Earth was created, probably from a moving cloud of matter from a supernova that got captured by the sun's gravity. The angular momentum of that original cloud is conserved in the angular momentum of the planets and their moons.

AM
 
It could be a misunderstanding, but a coworker who is 13 years younger than myself remembers being taught the same thing.
Thank you for the clarification.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top