Does expanding space cause cosmological redshift?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The cosmological redshift is definitively calculated to arise from the spacetime geometry of the universe, rather than being merely assumed to result from space expansion. In locally flat Minkowskian spacetime, photon wavelengths are observer-dependent, and comoving observers experience mutual redshift due to their relative motion. The approximation of local flatness is valid only over infinitesimally small regions, while curvature remains significant on larger scales. Observers separated by megaparsecs can verify isotropic Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation, while negligible redshift occurs over human time scales.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spacetime geometry and its implications in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the concept of comoving observers in cosmological models
  • Knowledge of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and its significance
  • Basic grasp of Minkowski spacetime and its properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of FLRW (Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker) cosmology
  • Study the relationship between redshift and distance in cosmological contexts
  • Explore the concept of observer-dependent phenomena in physics
  • Investigate the role of curvature in cosmological models and its effects on observations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanisms behind cosmological redshift and spacetime geometry.

p78653
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
The cosmological redshift is generally assumed to be due to space expansion.

But if spacetime is locally flat Minkowskian then surely photon wavelength should not change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p78653 said:
The cosmological redshift is generally assumed to be due to space expansion.
No, it isn't "assumed" to be due to anything. It is calculated to be due to the spacetime geometry of the universe and the relationship of the worldlines of light rays to the worldlines of comoving observers.

p78653 said:
if spacetime is locally flat Minkowskian then surely photon wavelength should not change?
No, this is not correct. There is no such thing as "photon wavelength" independent of a particular observer measuring the photon, or more precisely "light ray" (since we are not talking about quantum physics here and "photon" is a quantum concept).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and PeroK
p78653 said:
But if spacetime is locally flat Minkowskian then surely photon wavelength should not change?
This statement is analogous to the claim that because the surface of the Earth is locally flat Euclidean great circle paths can't cross again. The key point is that "locally flat" is an approximation that is only exactly true over a region of zero size. Actually, curvature is negligible over a small region, but never totally absent.

In an ideal FLRW universe you and I could independently verify that we each see the CMB as isotropic. If we were megaparsecs apart then as soon as we could see each other we would be able to see redshift in each other. But if we were only a meter apart our redshift would be something like ##10^{-18}## - unmeasurably small. It'd be 140 million years before we were 1cm further apart (assuming us being over-dense can be neglected - in fact our gravitational attraction would overwhelm our expansion velocity on a timescale of fractions of a microsecond). It would be totally fine to ignore cosmological curvature over human time scales. Just as you don't bother accounting for the curvature of the Earth when you tile a floor, but you need to worry about it when planning a city.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cianfa72, Klystron and Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
741
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K