Does frequency affect energy loss in light passing through glass?

AI Thread Summary
Frequency does affect the energy loss of light passing through glass, as the absorption of photons is influenced by the material's absorption spectrum. Higher frequency photons are absorbed and re-emitted more slowly, resulting in a longer retention of energy within the glass. This energy is primarily converted into heat, causing the glass to radiate energy at specific wavelengths, typically between 5 to 20 microns when near room temperature. The erratic results observed in experiments may stem from variations in the glass's properties and the specific frequencies tested. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately measuring the percentage of energy lost during transmission.
disgradius
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, recently I've been doing some experiments on how and if frequency would affect the amount of energy lost by light as it passes through glass. So far, I've had some rather erratic results. Can someone clarify for me whether frequency does affect the energy drop of light passing through glass and how? So far from what I've understood, photons are absorbed and re-emitted. The absorption of the photons depends on the individual absorption spectrum of the material in question. Once its absorbed though, higher energy photons tend to take longer to be re-emitted and so re-emission happens slower for higher frequencies, thus some energy would be left in the glass for awhile? Can someone confirm whether frequency has any effect at all and how it affects the % of energy lost?

Btw, this is not homework, experiment done outside of school.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absorbed light (usually) goes into heating the glass. Heated glass radiates energy, so you can think of the absorbed light as being converted to whatever wavelengths are radiated.

The radiated wavelengths depend on how hot the glass gets. Near room temperature they are mostly in the range 5 to 20 microns.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top