Does friction in any way increase when the surfaces get very smooth

AI Thread Summary
Friction can increase when surfaces are very smooth due to the phenomenon of cold welding, where smooth surfaces adhere strongly in a vacuum. This adhesion is primarily attributed to van der Waals forces, which are a result of electromagnetic interactions at a microscopic level. The discussion clarifies that van der Waals forces fall under the umbrella of electromagnetism. Understanding these forces is essential for grasping the relationship between surface smoothness and friction. The connection between surface characteristics and friction is complex and influenced by various physical principles.
arun babu
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
does friction in any way increase when the surfaces get very smooth ...?

a teacher told us that it can increase due to electromagnetism...is it true...i searched the net but couldn't get any useful info...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


arildno said:
Look up on the subject of cold welding.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_welding

thanks arildno...i viewed the above linked and learned that when very smooth surfaces are brought together in vacuum they adhere very strongly to each other...but it is due to van der waals forces right?k...this may be a silly question...but does van der waals forces come under electromagnetism...
 


Yes, van der Waals-forces ARE electromagnetism written small.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Why does ice have more friction when it's solid compared to when it's melting?
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Understanding Friction: The Impact of Inter-Molecular Bonding on Movement
Replies
2
Views
1K
What happens when the coefficient of friction is 0?
Replies
11
Views
3K
B Questions about momentum and force as well as normal force/friction
Replies
35
Views
3K
I Static rotational friction: does diameter matter?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Dependence of friction on area.
Replies
6
Views
2K
B The physics of flywheel launchers (like tennis ball shooters)
2
Replies
60
Views
4K
I Looking for a formula for damage when sliding to a stop
Replies
18
Views
1K
Friction and Relation of Coefficient of Friction to Smoothness
Replies
3
Views
3K
How Does Increased Surface Tension Affect Liquid Surface Area and Volume?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top