Does Friction Oppose Motion on an Inclined Surface?

AI Thread Summary
Friction always acts in the opposite direction to the relative motion between an object and the surface it is on. When an object moves on an inclined surface, friction opposes its motion, not moving in the same direction. For example, if a brick is dropped onto a moving plank, friction will accelerate the brick in the direction of the plank's motion until they move at the same speed. This demonstrates that friction seeks to equalize the motion of the object with that of the surface. Thus, friction does not move in the same direction as the object but rather opposes its relative motion.
Nstraw
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
If we Are moving an object on an inclined surface than shouldn't friction be in the same direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nstraw said:
If we Are moving an object on an inclined surface than shouldn't friction be in the same direction?
Same direction as what? The motion of the object?
 
Nstraw said:
If we Are moving an object on an inclined surface than shouldn't friction be in the same direction?

Friction is always in the opposite direction to the direction of movement of an object.
 
anjelin said:
Friction is always in the opposite direction to the direction of movement of an object.

Not exactly.
It opposes the RELATIVE motion the object has to say, the underlying surface.

That is:
Friction seeks to equalize the motions of the object and the surface.

Suppose you drop a brick (no horizontal velocity) onto a moving plank.
The friction from the plank will accelerate the brick in the direction of its own generated horizontal motion, until the brick moves with the same speed as the plank.
 
So friction will oppose the motion
 
Nstraw said:
So friction will oppose the motion

It opposes relative motion between the object and the surface.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top