Does gravity affect to wavelengths?

Keru
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
My question is... Does the wavelength of light (in vacuum space, of course) suffer changes as it approaches to a gravity field, or simply stays the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wavelengths are frame variant, so they depend on the reference frame used to measure them. So you need to specify the frames before your question can be answered. Also, different gravity fields have different properties, so you need to specify that also.

If you consider the gravity field around a spherical non-rotating planet and the reference frame of observers which are stationary wrt the planet then the wavelength will be shorter for observers lower down.
 
Keru said:
My question is... Does the wavelength of light (in vacuum space, of course) suffer changes as it approaches to a gravity field, or simply stays the same?

It changes. As a simple example, if you are standing on the surface of the Earth and shine a flashlight into outer space, the energy of that light beam will become progressively red-shifted the farther it travels out into space. Conversely, if you were in outer space shining a flashlight towards the Earth, the energy of the light beam would become progressively blue-shifted as it approached the Earth.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top