Does gravity cause electric resistance?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential relationship between gravity and electric resistance in conductive materials, particularly focusing on how the orientation of a wire in a gravitational field might influence the behavior of electric current. Participants explore theoretical implications, experimental challenges, and the feasibility of measuring such effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that when a wire is oriented vertically in a gravitational field, the flow of electrons could be affected by gravitational potential, potentially leading to observable voltage changes.
  • Others suggest that the compression of the conductor when vertical might offset any gravitational effects, impacting resistance and transmission times.
  • One participant notes that the effect of gravity on electrons is likely to be extremely small, possibly at the Planck scale, making it difficult to measure.
  • There is a suggestion that using heavier charged particles, such as heavy ions, might yield more measurable effects compared to electrons.
  • Concerns are raised about the need for sensitive measuring devices and the challenges posed by thermal noise in experiments aimed at detecting these effects.
  • Some participants discuss the potential for using different materials to create a measurable difference in behavior when charged particles move in opposing gravitational directions.
  • One participant questions the relevance of existing experiments with ions in particle colliders, suggesting that the conditions may not be suitable for observing gravitational effects.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for charged particles to be cooled sufficiently to observe gravitational effects, proposing that a non-uniform charge distribution could be measurable if conditions are right.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the plausibility of a gravitational effect on electric resistance but express uncertainty regarding the magnitude and measurability of such an effect. Multiple competing views exist regarding the best approach to experimental verification, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations related to the small scale of the effect, the need for advanced measuring techniques, and the potential influence of thermal noise on experimental outcomes.

haael
Messages
537
Reaction score
35
Suppose we have a wire and we pass electric current through it. When placed horizontally in a gravity field, the wire has some resistance. Now what happens, when we place this wire vertically?

Suppose the electrons are flowing upwards. They have to counter gravity potential, so this should be visible as a voltage loss. On the other hand, when electrons fly downwards, they should gain some energy, so perhaps not resistance, but voltage is the proper description of this phenomenon.

Has this ever been measured? Maybe there are some special materials, i.e. semiconductors, where this effect is exceptionally large. This woud make a fine accelerometer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer to it, but it sounds plausible to me. It would require incredibly sensitive equipment, but I would think it's possible.

Though it might also be offset by the compression of the conductor when it's in the vertical alignment position. A 10 km long wire would be say 9,999 meters due to compression when it's vertical, leading to different transmission times due to the length, and also leading to reduced resistance due to the atoms being slightly closer together.
 
are you asking if the electric field interacts with the gravitational field.
 
I agree with the "plausibility"
Electrons have mass, thus affected by gravity.
Though it's effect might be incredibly hard to measure in that circumstance, it seems right.
 
Uh oh. I did some small research. It doesn't look good.

This effect is indeed extremely small - of the order of Planck scale. I was naively hoping to compare electron's charge and mass. The numbers that appear are close to 10^-31. When you have an electron in equilibrium in an electric field pushing it up and in a gravity field pulling down, then varying the gravitation compared to varying electric field gives numbers as small as the ratio of electron's charge to its mass in Planck units :).

Additionally, the measuring device would have to be cooled down below nanokelvins, since the thermal noise energy of electrons is many orders larger than their gravitational energy.

The only solution would be to find some much heavier charged particles, that are capable of transferring current. Maybe some heavy ions (uranium) could be injected into vacuum lamp and produce some measurable effect. Maybe we could use some chemical molecule that can survive ionisation.
Or maybe we can use semiconductors or something, where electrons gain mass and are affected by gravity.

It's still far in the future. I will not have such compact accelerometer, maybe my grandchildren will :).
 
If you are going to measure this at all there will have to be some sort of measuring device, like a meter, somewhere. This measuring device is going to have to be connected to both ends of your test wire, thus creating a loop. Any voltage that exists in the test wire will be canceled out by matching and opposing voltage in the test leads leading from the ends of your wire to the meter.
 
I have a feeling that the experiment with the greatest likelihood of success would be to use a long horizontal beam of very heavy (mercury?) ions with as low a velocity as one could get. One could calculate the deviation that you would get due to gravity - given the motivation.
 
The ions in RHIC goes around many times around its ring. Has there been ANY indication of its mass being affected by gravity? If there isn't, then what hope is there that electrical current, where electrons are the charge carriers, would exhibit an effect to gravity?

Zz.
 
In 'the collider' the ions are traveling as fast as is possible. What you need is the reverse. They need to be going slowly so as to have enough time to observe them falling down. You would need to operate the equipment 'both ways up' to see the effect, if any.
 
  • #10
This measuring device is going to have to be connected to both ends of your test wire, thus creating a loop. Any voltage that exists in the test wire will be canceled out by matching and opposing voltage in the test leads leading from the ends of your wire to the meter.
Yes, I know. That's why I wanted to use two different materials, where charged particles have different masses. One way up, another way down - the difference should be possible to be measured, in principle.

I have a feeling that the experiment with the greatest likelihood of success would be to use a long horizontal beam of very heavy (mercury?) ions with as low a velocity as one could get.
Yes, but they still have to be cooled down, so they can fall in gravity field. Their thermal velocity should be smaller than the escape velocity from Earth, lol :).

If the ions are cold enough, we should observe slightly more ions on the bottom of the chamber. The charge would not be distributed uniformly, what can be measured.

---
To be clear once again: I want to measure gravity or acceleration using electricity alone, without having some macroscopic reference body on springs. The massive body in my setup are charged particles, the "springs" are electric force.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
You could collimate the beam, surely??
 
  • #12
ZapperZ said:
The ions in RHIC goes around many times around its ring. Has there been ANY indication of its mass being affected by gravity? If there isn't, then what hope is there that electrical current, where electrons are the charge carriers, would exhibit an effect to gravity?

Zz.

With all due respect, are you being sarcastic or making a point?
Your post, Zapper, is somewhat confusing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K