Astro_Will said:
Does gravity have a finite speed at which it effects an object.
This forum has a FAQ on this:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=635645
Also, the Usenet Physics FAQ gives a good overview:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html
Astro_Will said:
For example (and this is strictly hypothetical) if a new star were to suddenly appear near the orbit of Saturn
This is not just hypothetical, it's impossible. A star can't appear out of nowhere; that would violate conservation of energy. That means we can't even formulate a consistent mathematical model in General Relativity of what you are trying to describe. It turns out to be somewhat tricky to formulate a scenario that captures what we intuitively think of when we think of "changes in gravity propagating", and can also be consistently modeled in GR. However, when we do, as the FAQs above note, the answer we get is that gravity propagates at the speed of light.
Astro_Will said:
When I think of Newtonian gravity I would just assume it travels at c
No; the speed of gravity in Newton's theory is infinite. Just look at the expression for gravitational force:
[tex]F = \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r^2}[/tex]
The [itex]m_1[/itex], [itex]m_2[/itex], and [itex]r[/itex] in that equation are all evaluated "right now"--in Newton's theory there is absolute space and absolute time, so "right now" has a well-defined meaning. So if any variable changes, the entire Universe instantly "sees" the change. This is the main reason why Einstein, once he had come up with Special Relativity, had to then come up with a new theory of gravity--General Relativity: the old theory of gravity, Newton's, was obviously incompatible with relativity.
Astro_Will said:
If gravity does travel at c is that only in a vacuum?
I don't know that this aspect of the question has really been considered; all of the treatments that I'm aware of only talk about gravitational waves (which are the way changes in gravity propagate) in a vacuum.