Does ionization affect the volume of hydrogen gas at STP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Misha Kuznetsov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen Volume
AI Thread Summary
At STP, a mole of hydrogen gas occupies 22.4 L, but if ionized to remove all electrons, the volume occupied by protons would not be equivalent. Ionized hydrogen, consisting solely of protons, would not behave like an ideal gas due to the significant repulsive Coulomb forces between the positively charged protons. Consequently, the pressure in a 22.4 L container filled with protons would be lower than that of a mole of hydrogen gas. The discussion highlights the complexities of ionized matter and the implications of atomic structure on volume and pressure. Overall, ionization alters the behavior of hydrogen significantly, leading to different physical properties.
Misha Kuznetsov
Messages
49
Reaction score
4
At STP, a mole of hydrogen gas would take up 22.4 L. If that hydrogen gas was ionized and stripped of 100% of the electrons, would the remaining protons have a larger volume than 22.4 L? I'm not sure because on one hand, taking away the electrons leaves each proton with much less volume, but on the other hand, protons repel from one another.

So in essence, would the pressure be higher in a 22.4 L container full of hydrogen gas or the corresponding number of protons?

- Misha
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Misha Kuznetsov said:
At STP, a mole of hydrogen gas would take up 22.4 L. If that hydrogen gas was ionized and stripped of 100% of the electrons, would the remaining protons have a larger volume than 22.4 L? I'm not sure because on one hand, taking away the electrons leaves each proton with much less volume, but on the other hand, protons repel from one another.

So in essence, would the pressure be higher in a 22.4 L container full of hydrogen gas or the corresponding number of protons?

- Misha
The quick answer is no. I don't think a bunch of ionized hydrogen atoms can reasonably approximate a perfect gas.
 
OK, so the pressure in a 22.4 L container would be less if it was filled with protons than if it was filled with a mole of hydrogen gas?
 
Misha Kuznetsov said:
OK, so the pressure in a 22.4 L container would be less if it was filled with protons than if it was filled with a mole of hydrogen gas?

Do you really think that a container filled with a bunch of positively charged ions is going to have lower pressure? This thing would probably blow up like a bomb, assuming you could corral the ions in the first place.

Don't discount the effect of Coulomb forces when talking about matter which is ionized.
 
Alright, I just wasn't sure how it would work. Since 99.999% of an atom is empty space, I thought that maybe this would cause it to take up less volume.

But thank you for answering.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top