Does Light Reflect at the Boundary Between Water and Flint Glass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsguy101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary Reflection
AI Thread Summary
At the boundary between water and flint glass, light does indeed reflect as well as refract. Snell's law can be used to determine the angle of refraction, but it does not provide definitive information about reflection without further calculations. Reflection occurs at the interface, even if the amount varies based on the angles and indices of refraction. It is noted that using polarized light can lead to scenarios where refraction occurs without reflection. Overall, both reflection and refraction are present at the boundary, confirming the complexity of light behavior at different mediums.
physicsguy101
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At the boundary between water (n=1.33) and flint glass (n=1.66), incoming light at ~49 degrees from the normal is refracted.

Of course, I can use Snell's law to calculate the angle of refraction.

However, my question is whether any of the light at this boundary is also Reflected??

I think it would be because light reflects off both rough (diffuse reflection) and smooth surfaces, but can anybody confirm?

Thanks!

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



See above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can confirm that your heuristic reasoning is incorrect. You do not know if it reflects or not unless you run through the equations.

Eyeballing the numbers there is a 50-50 chance you have no refelection.
 
Yes in general reflection and refraction always occur in pairs much as in a transverse wave traveling on a string which is rare on its initial part and denser on the other .You get two waves when the transverse wave approaches the joint one which returns back(reflection) and the other which continues its path (refraction).Mathematically there is a reflection unless the strings are the same .(it is just an analogy).
However using polarized light one can get a refraction with no reflection at all.
Using Snell's law one can only verify whether light can be refracted or not ,if it can then what the angle is.Since the light approaches through the rarer medium (water) there is no scope of total internal reflection which is in a way a synonym for no refraction.
Correct me if I am wrong.
regards
Yukoel
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top