Does ω^2 Equal v^2/r^2 or (v/r)^2 in Angular Velocity Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter acat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Break
acat
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
ok, if angual velocity ω = linear velocity v / radius r

therefore ω=v/r

but what if i have ω^2 ( to the power of 2 )

does ω^2=v^2/r^2

or does it eqaul ω^2=(v/r)^2

many thanks, this is really bugging me and preventing me solve a problem since I am not in class
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


it's same. moreover, if you are getting confused check it dimensionally.
 


of course of course, thank you, gawd this is a hard problem I am working on, just making sure all the particulars are in the right place and where they should be as I am not managing to solve this at all, ill carry on though lol. thanks dude
 


acat said:
ok, if angual velocity ω = linear velocity v / radius r

therefore ω=v/r

but what if i have ω^2 ( to the power of 2 )

does ω^2=v^2/r^2

or does it eqaul ω^2=(v/r)^2

many thanks, this is really bugging me and preventing me solve a problem since I am not in class

They are the same.
 


Also this has nothing to do with "Linear and Abstract Algebra" so I am moving it to "General Math".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top