Does Our Milky Way Stir Up Solar System Collisions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the likelihood of solar system collisions due to the Milky Way's motion. It argues that while the galaxy's spinning creates a dynamic environment, the vast distances between stars make direct collisions between solar systems highly improbable. Even if two solar systems were to come close, the resulting gravitational interactions would likely disrupt planetary orbits rather than lead to direct collisions. The conversation also highlights that while interplanetary collisions can occur, they are rare events in the context of the vastness of space. In denser regions like globular clusters, the chances of star interactions increase, but these areas typically lack stable planetary systems.
really.
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I was talking with a guy last night who was trying to tell me this: Our galaxy is stirring up as it spins and this might cause another planet to come along and collide with earth. My first comment was that the stuff in the galaxy is all caught up in the same "stirring" motion, so it's not likely that solar systems would cross paths just because of this action. I also posited that if we were ever close enough to another planet that our star would also be close enough to the other star that the real story would be the collision of these two bodies—that is, even a planet in an orbit on the magnitude of Pluto's, isn't far enough to allow the planets to mix along the lines of what was being said. Anyway, can someone quickly weigh in on this debate? Does the Milky Way stir itself up, and would it ever be possible for solar systems to be close enough to allow their planets to collide while maintaining the separation of the stars?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
"Not likely" is the byword. Keep in mind that if the sun is a basket ball, then Uranus is a smallish pea located a little over a half mile away, and Alpha Centauri is trundling about at a distance of 500 miles. There's simply an awful lot of space and not much matter, so collisions are unlikely. Even so, an encounter between two solar systems would probably result in severe disruptions to the orbits of their planets, possibly even exchanges of planets. It is likely that the resulting configurations would be unstable and take several million years to sort themselves out. That gives ample opportunity for interplanetary collisions. That's not to say that inter-planetary collisions never happen, just that you are unlikely to be standing on one when it does. Keep in mind that a lot can go on among 100 billion stars during 10 billion years.

On the other hand, star densities in globular clusters are hundreds or thousands of times larger than in our part of the Milky Way, and it's unlikely any stars there have long-term planetary companions.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top