Does Photons bouce off eachother

  • Thread starter Thread starter bassplayer142
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
Does a photon bounce off another photon. Say you had hundreds of watts of laser photons shooting in one direction. Then in the other direction a few stray photons. Will they get deflected off to the side or backwards? If so, then it would explain why the double slit experiment would work. That the photons are constantly bumping into each other and going separate ways. That is unless they are not deflected in the up and down axis though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bassplayer142 said:
Does a photon bounce off another photon. Say you had hundreds of watts of laser photons shooting in one direction. Then in the other direction a few stray photons. Will they get deflected off to the side or backwards? If so, then it would explain why the double slit experiment would work. That the photons are constantly bumping into each other and going separate ways. That is unless they are not deflected in the up and down axis though.

The interaction of visible spectrum photons is predicted in QED. However, it is a very weak 4-th order effect, which has not been observed yet, as far as I know. Even if this interaction was strong, it could not be used to explain the double-slit experiment, because the interference pattern exists even when photons are released one-by-one, and do not have a chance to interact with each other.

Eugene.
 
Ok, so I've tried several times already, but can't seem to figure out what QED stands for. I'd guess the Q is quantum, but that's as far as I get. Can someone help me please? Thanks.

Besides that the double-slit works with individual photons at a time, I don't see how this collision effect could play a large role. It simply doesn't seem to create or imply an interference pattern (wave interference), at least as far as I can see.

A possibly interesting point is this then: a photon bouncing off another should count as detection, right? So if the photons were hitting a lot, wouldn't they seemingly lose their wave-like properties, and thus not form as strong an interference pattern if many photons were shot simultaneously?
 
ganstaman said:
Ok, so I've tried several times already, but can't seem to figure out what QED stands for. I'd guess the Q is quantum, but that's as far as I get. Can someone help me please? Thanks.

QED = quantum electrodynamics

Eugene.
 
ganstaman said:
Ok, so I've tried several times already, but can't seem to figure out what QED stands for. I'd guess the Q is quantum, but that's as far as I get. Can someone help me please? Thanks.

I select the word in the text, right-click, and choose "Search Dictionary for QED..." and that opens this page in another tab.

Very handy for all my reading! Paper just cannot compare.
 

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'

Thread 'Lesser Green's function'

The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How does a band pass filter increase the time of arrival of photons?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Is it possible for a BBO crystal to produce an interference pattern?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Free particle probability distribution
Replies
22
Views
2K
I Have You Heard of the SEW Experiment? Thoughts?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I A short attenuated laser pulse, LIGO, and a fast detector
Replies
1
Views
820
B Can we say a photon doesn't exist until the wavefunction collapses?
Replies
16
Views
3K
I Photon interference and path differences
Replies
18
Views
2K
A Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
B Yet another double slit thought experiment...
Replies
20
Views
2K
I Radiofrequncy Photon Wavefunction
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top