Does Physics Forums Still have independent research section ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nick1o2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The "independent research section" of Physics Forums, present around 2011, has been removed due to the high volume of unqualified contributions and the excessive moderation required. The section attracted many individuals deemed as "crackpots," leading to concerns about the quality of discussions. Its removal was not formally announced, but the decision was based on the disproportionate effort it demanded from volunteer moderators compared to the value it provided. The community acknowledges that the lack of this section helps maintain the forum's integrity. Overall, the focus is now on ensuring quality and reducing the burden on moderators.
nick1o2
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Does Physics Forums Still have "independent research section"?

I remember like in 2011-ish physics forums had a section called "independent research section" I can't find it on the main dash, unless it is hidden somewhere :P

What was the main reason why they removed it if it was every announced?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
yeah i guess that makes sense, don't they call them quacks?
 
nick1o2 said:
yeah i guess that makes sense, don't they call them quacks?

A quack is usually a medical crackpot :)
 
ahhh, my mind is blow now.
 
Bottom line is it required a lot of moderators' (volunteer, unpaid) time compared to the amount of value it added to the forum.
 

Thread 'Thank you to mentors, advisors and members'

I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
View full post »

Thread 'Site Usability nitpick -- Hyperlinks should be underlined'

This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
View full post »

Thread 'Thank you physics forums, 20 years later'

About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
View full post »

Similar threads

Introduction: Independent Researcher in Foundational Physics
Replies
6
Views
89
Can Under-18s Publish Theories in Academic Forums?
Replies
3
Views
531
Praise My feedback, one month and half experience in PF so far
Replies
1
Views
3K
Admissions How Can I Overcome Limited Research Experience for Grad School in Physics?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Am I allowed to post a link to my website?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Programs Take a 5th year to do more research?
Replies
3
Views
2K
PF Needs A Personal Theory Forum Like We Need A Computer Virus
Replies
2
Views
5K
How to switch from engineering with unknown undergrad name to Physics?
Replies
16
Views
2K
What does it mean to be intellectually sound in discussing physics?
Replies
11
Views
6K
Admissions Statement of purpose critique request (high-energy theory PhD)
Replies
0
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top