Does Potential Energy Work In Horizontal Plane?

AI Thread Summary
Potential energy (PE) can indeed work in a horizontal plane, particularly in the context of spring potential energy, which is defined by the formula PE = (1/2)kx^2. When a spring is compressed or elongated, the potential energy changes regardless of the orientation of the spring. The key factor is the change in the spring's length, which affects the potential energy stored in it. Therefore, as long as the spring is being manipulated, its potential energy is relevant in any plane. Understanding this concept clarifies how potential energy operates in different orientations.
zm500
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Is there such thing?
I know that PE = (1/2)kx^2.
Does PE work in horizontal plane.
I don't get the concept
So like a person is spinning the mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Spring PE will "work" in whatever plane the spring is in. As long as the spring is being compressed or elongated, spring PE is changing.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top