Does Reversing Battery Terminals Affect a Potential Divider Circuit?

AI Thread Summary
Reversing battery terminals in a potential divider circuit can affect the functionality depending on the voltmeter used. If the voltmeter is capable of reading both positive and negative voltages, the circuit will operate correctly with reversed terminals. However, if the voltmeter cannot handle negative voltages, it will require a reversal of connections to provide accurate readings. The output voltage calculation remains valid as long as the voltmeter is appropriately configured. Understanding the voltmeter's capabilities is crucial for ensuring accurate measurements in this scenario.
uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
I've seen some images of potential dividers in which the battery terminals are reversed, e.g. the normal case is this::
http://www.antonine-education.co.uk/New_items/DIG/Potential_Divider.gif
So will it still work if the battery terminals were reversed here and input voltage goes directly to R2 and the voltmeter combination instead of going across R1? (i.e. the current goes to R2 first and then R1 where we calculate the output voltage) Please explain!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the voltmeter. If it can read both positive and negative voltages then it will work just fine. Otherwise, you would need to reverse the voltmeter connection whenever you reverse the battery connection.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Physics domain analysis of Voltage drop in series resistor
Replies
7
Views
2K
Finding Optimal Fixed Resistor for Potential Divider Circuit
Replies
45
Views
4K
Electromotive Force, Batteries, Resistors, and Potential Differences
Replies
17
Views
2K
Electrical potential energy questions for a battery circuit
Replies
4
Views
1K
Buck converter will power LED's but voltage divider will not....
Replies
4
Views
2K
Engineering Circuit input impedance with ground in an OP Amp circuit
Replies
4
Views
3K
Electricity, finding voltage and resistance
Replies
15
Views
3K
Can a reed switch use a wheatstone bridge/potential divider?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Exploring Electrical Potential Energy Across Series Circuits
Replies
3
Views
2K
Ideal Batteries' Internal Resistance
Replies
2
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top