Does Salam-Weinberg theory not work at very high energy?

ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
It seem to me that Salam Weinberg theory of weak interaction does not work at very high energy,because weak bosons are massive and transversal at the limit q^{2}→0.
Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please teach me this. Why don't you get a textbook? You have asked one hundred and thirty two one-line questions. It is surely more efficient than asking PF to essentially write you a textbook one line at a time.

Also, it wouldn't hurt you to say "thank you" once in a while.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top