Does socializing trigger neurtransmitters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nano-Passion
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Socializing can trigger various neurotransmitters that influence happiness, with oxytocin being a significant neuromodulator associated with social interactions and intimacy. Dopaminergic neurons also play a role in reward mechanisms related to both social and non-social behaviors. However, the relationship between neurotransmitters and social behavior is complex, as each neurotransmitter serves multiple functions. The discussion highlights that not all social interactions lead to happiness; factors such as genetic predispositions, developmental influences, and learned behaviors significantly affect social experiences. Abnormal neural functioning, inadequate nutrition during fetal development, and cultural upbringing can all impact an individual's ability to socialize effectively. This complexity suggests that understanding socialization requires a multifaceted approach, considering both biological and environmental factors.
Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
Does socializing (straightforward, without laughter) trigger neurotransmitters that make you feel happier?

If so what is/are their names.

What neurotransmitters are triggered when smiling/laughing?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
socializing undoubtedly triggers neurotransmitters (as does any stimulus/response behavior).

not sure what you mean by "straightforward" or why you are particularly concerned about neurotransmitters. You might be more interested in hormones that are neuromodulators, like oxytocin: a very important social hormone in mammals.

dopaminergic neurons, for instance, are involved in general reward mechanisms (both social and non-social), but classifying behaviors by neurotransmitter doesn't seem like it would lead to a clear and predictive division because each class of neurotransmitter serves so many functions. I'm not saying that oxytocin doesn't serve other functions, but it is play a very prominent role in intimacy.
 
Pythagorean said:
socializing undoubtedly triggers neurotransmitters (as does any stimulus/response behavior).

not sure what you mean by "straightforward" or why you are particularly concerned about neurotransmitters. You might be more interested in hormones that are neuromodulators, like oxytocin: a very important social hormone in mammals.

dopaminergic neurons, for instance, are involved in general reward mechanisms (both social and non-social), but classifying behaviors by neurotransmitter doesn't seem like it would lead to a clear and predictive division because each class of neurotransmitter serves so many functions. I'm not saying that oxytocin doesn't serve other functions, but it is play a very prominent role in intimacy.

Thanks for your reply. I did some quick research on neuromodulators.

What I'm particularly concerned with is the exact chemistry of why so many people loathe to socialize. I want to know in much more detail (probably picked up that habit from mathematics hehe). But maybe its not that cut and clear yet.

For example, not all socialization makes you "happy". Sometimes you feel bored and you just want to leave and do something else. What really happens in the brain during those differences intrigue me.
 
Well, there's the big three: genetic, developmental, and learned.

That is, in some cases the difference comes about from abnormal functioning in neural centers that are associated with social behavior. Some people are just never properly equipped for socializing as we know it via neurological illness from genetic mutation. This would be genetic.

Developmentally, if a fetus doesn't receive proper nutrition or receives toxins, there can be biological problems that aren't quite genetic.

But some people are just not properly raised in the society to which they will be participating as an adult. The most obvious example is feral children. They never learned social mannerisms, so they wouldn't be able to interpret social cues in the first place beyond those that are said to be "hard wired". A less critical case: if you move to another country after learning how to socialize in your native country, there may be lots of social boundaries to overcome (besides just the obvious language barrier).

Besides international cultural conflicts, there's also subcultural conflicts. If you were raised by hippies in the country, you may have trouble relating to gangsters in the city.

So there's a big soup of mechanisms to choose from and now we've just barely scratched the surface of each.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
I use ethanol for cleaning glassware and resin 3D prints. The glassware is sometimes used for food. If possible, I'd prefer to only keep one grade of ethanol on hand. I've made sugar mash, but that is hardly the least expensive feedstock for ethanol. I had given some thought to using wheat flour, and for this I would need a source for amylase enzyme (relevant data, but not the core question). I am now considering animal feed that I have access to for 20 cents per pound. This is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top