Does spin change under Lorentz boosts?

QuantumCosmo
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I was wondering if the spin of a particle changed under Lorentz boosts. I think what it comes down to is if S^2 commutes with the generators of Lorentz boosts (the components of S only generate the rotations of the spinor I think). I think that should be true (an electron should always be a spin 1/2 particle in every coordinate system). So I hope S^2 commutes with those generators?
The next question is: What about the spin direction? Take S_z for example. Does S_z commute with the generators of Lorentz boosts? If an electron has spin up in one coordinate system, does it have spin up in all others too?
(For rotations that is obviously not true. If we rotate the system around the x axis, a particle that was previously characterized by spin in the z direction will now have a component in the y direction too because S_z and S_x don't commute)
Thank you,
QuantumCosmo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spin orientation does change, but spin 1/2 which should better read S² = 1/2 * (1/2 + 1) = 3/4 is valid in all reference frames. This due the fact that the S² is something like the second Casimir (p²=m² is the first) and therefore commutes with all Lorentz generators. More exactly, one has to use the Pauli-Lubanski operator W instead of S; for W one finds W² = -m² s (s+1) which is a c-number.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli-lubanski_pseudovector
 
Last edited:
Note that it is not straightforward to interpret the Pauli-Lubanski vector as a spin vector when the particle is moving. Wμ is orthogonal to Pμ in the four-dimensional sense, so for a moving particle Wμ will have a time component. And of course the three space components (Wx, Wy, Wz) taken by themselves won't have the expected norm.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top