Does spinning a massive sphere create extra gravity pull?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Slingshot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere Spinning
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Spinning a massive sphere does not create additional gravitational pull beyond its initial gravitational force. While the concept of relativistic mass suggests that increasing an object's speed could increase its gravitational influence, this is not the case in general relativity (GR). The source of gravity is described by the stress-energy tensor, not merely by mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²). Effects such as the geodetic effect and frame dragging are relevant phenomena that illustrate the complexities of gravity in rotating systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with the concept of relativistic mass
  • Knowledge of the stress-energy tensor
  • Basic principles of angular momentum and kinetic energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the geodetic effect in general relativity
  • Explore frame dragging and its implications in rotating bodies
  • Study the stress-energy tensor and its role in gravity
  • Investigate the relationship between kinetic energy and gravitational effects
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the nuances of gravitational theory and rotating systems.

Slingshot
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Does spinning a massive sphere at high speed would somehow create extra gravity pull (or some sort of phenomenon perceived as such) added to it's initial gravity force (rest state gravity/not spinning state gravity)?

I came to the assumption that accelerating the speed of an object would result of the increase of it's mass (relativistic mass). By increasing it's mass, wouldn't it be increasing it's gravitational force?

While obviously a spinning sphere is not traveling to an outward direction, it is none the less moving in a rotational manner. Shouldn't having a high angular velocity create more gravity force near the equatorial region of the sphere (since it is also matters that are traveling at a high velocity) and less to the poles or to the center within?

Yes I am aware that I might be totally off base due to probably a lot of misconception, so if you can answer and explain with clear example and analogy instead of a simply "no you don't make sense" would really help.
But thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're sort of on the right track. The kinetic energy does add to the equivalent mass. However, you also get effects like the geodetic effect and frame dragging, which you can find out about by googling, WP, etc. The basic principle is that in GR, the source of gravity is not the scalar mass-energy but the stress-energy tensor. Therefore it's not sufficient just to use E=mc2 to convert the spinning Earth's KE into an equivalent amount of mass.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K