Does SR Affect Biological Processes? A Twin Experiment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of special relativity (SR) on biological processes, particularly through a thought experiment involving twin brothers, one of whom travels at relativistic speeds. Participants explore whether time dilation affects biological functions such as hair growth and delve into the broader implications of time travel as predicted by SR.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that time dilation affects all processes, including biological ones, suggesting that the twin who travels at relativistic speeds will have shorter hair upon return due to slower biological processes.
  • Others contend that each observer measures time normally in their own frame, implying that biological processes should appear unaffected from the perspective of each twin.
  • A participant mentions that the concept of "rate of time" is ambiguous and seeks clarification on its mathematical expression.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility of time travel, with one suggesting that it may be feasible to travel to the past by navigating the geometry of spacetime, referencing Gödel's Universe.
  • There is a mention of experimental evidence regarding the lifetimes of high-speed particles, which aligns with predictions made by Lorentz transformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether biological processes are affected by time dilation, with no consensus reached. The discussion on time travel also reveals competing interpretations of SR's implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of measuring time and biological processes across different inertial frames, indicating that assumptions about synchronization and measurement may influence conclusions drawn from the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring the intersections of physics and biology, as well as individuals curious about the implications of special relativity on time and biological processes.

AlbertEinstein
Messages
113
Reaction score
1
Is SR "real"?

What I mean to say is that as SR predicts time dilation, do the biological processes also slow down?
Suppose A and B are two twin brothers.one of them(A) goes for a space tour in a spaceship with a velocity comparable with c, while the other(B)remains on earth. Clearly, for B the time will run slowly in A's spaceship, while for A it will be normal in his frame. Further suppose that A returns to Earth after t years(according to Earth frame). Again suppose that A does not trim his hair while on spaceship and his hair has grown a bit during tour.The same applies to B. Now what I want to ask that if we compare the lengths of both brothers' hair ,whose length will be greater and why?

This question I was discussing with my friend and he says that biological processes are not affected in SR both lengths will be same. I argued that time dilation takes place in everything including biological processes and therefore length of A's hair will be smaller. However I too was confused therefore sought to help here.Hoping some comments.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct; your friend is wrong. Time dilation affects all kinds of "clocks", biological or otherwise.

In your own frame, time always appears to run normally. According to your clocks, it takes the same time for your hair to grow 6 inches no matter how fast you move. If someone else (moving with respect to you) says your clocks run slowly, they must also say your hair grows slowly!
 
Last edited:
Thanks Doc. One more question: does SR predict the concept of time machines.If yes, can we go back and forth in time? My intution says that we may be able to go in future but not in past. What is you comment?

Thanks.
 
SR does predict (after a fashion) that you can travel to the future (faster than you are now): Just take a high-speed round-trip rocketship journey to anywhere you like. When you return to Earth, you will find that more time has passed for the folks you left behind than has passed for you in your rocket--so you have gone to the future. But I'm afraid it's a one-way trip.
 
An early test of relativity was to compare the average lifetimes of high speed elementary particles with the average lifetimes of the same elementary particles stationary with respect to the lab. The average lifetimes of high speed particles were found to be extended in keeping with the Lorentz tranform calculations.
 
AlbertEinstein said:
Thanks Doc. One more question: does SR predict the concept of time machines.If yes, can we go back and forth in time? My intution says that we may be able to go in future but not in past. What is you comment?

Thanks.

In a sense, the special theory states we can travel to the future. What this really means is that one can "cheat time". The faster you go, the slower your rate of time compared to those you left behind. Let's say your twin brother on Earth ages 10 years, but you have only aged 10 days by the time you return. At no point has anyone stepped thru a door into the future. You exist in space & time the entire time your twin brother exists in space & time. Only difference, your rate of time was slower while his was faster, over the same interval. You aged slower. As Doc_AL stated, there's no going back though. Cheating time cannot cause others to age slower then you, nor can it send you backwards in time.

pess
 
Last edited:
AlbertEinstein said:
What I mean to say is that as SR predicts time dilation, do the biological processes also slow down?
Suppose A and B are two twin brothers.one of them(A) goes for a space tour in a spaceship with a velocity comparable with c, while the other(B)remains on earth. Clearly, for B the time will run slowly in A's spaceship, while for A it will be normal in his frame. Further suppose that A returns to Earth after t years(according to Earth frame). Again suppose that A does not trim his hair while on spaceship and his hair has grown a bit during tour.The same applies to B. Now what I want to ask that if we compare the lengths of both brothers' hair ,whose length will be greater and why?

This question I was discussing with my friend and he says that biological processes are not affected in SR both lengths will be same. I argued that time dilation takes place in everything including biological processes and therefore length of A's hair will be smaller. However I too was confused therefore sought to help here.Hoping some comments.

Thanks
As Doc Al said, you are right and your friend is wrong. Each observer A and B is at rest in an inertial frame. Therefore if you set up a light clock in that frame then it can serve as a clock to measure all other processes that occur in that frame including biological clocks which determine the rates of bilogical functions. Nothing has changed in this frame, nothing. So a light clock can be used to synchronize any other clock which you choose to use as a time piece. The same for the inertial observer B. He too is in a state of rest where he can also set up a light clock which can be used to synchronize other clocks and then be used to measure the rates of biological functions. Since each observer can observer the others light clock and it is readily shown here

http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/light_clock.htm

that A measures Bs light clock to be running slower than his. B measures As light clock to be running slow compared to his too. The process of one observer turning around provides a break in the symetry of the situation and when all the t's are crossed and the i's dotted it is seen that B is older in every way that a person can be older than A.

Pete
 
What I noticed that everyone says about "rate of time ".Exactly what does this signify?When we talk about rate of something we usually quote it in terms of derivative of time or space.How can "rate of time" be expressed in mathematical notation?
 
We can go to past if we travel around the geometry of space time.
 
  • #10
AlbertEinstein said:
What I noticed that everyone says about "rate of time ".Exactly what does this signify?When we talk about rate of something we usually quote it in terms of derivative of time or space.How can "rate of time" be expressed in mathematical notation?

by ... dT/dt, or dt/dT.

No one can tell the rate at which their own time goes by by observation of your own clock alone. They can only tell how fast it goes relative to another's rate of time. You compare your clock vs his, or maybe you compare some steady atomic activity of known constant rate between your frame & his.

pess
 
  • #11
gautamaish said:
We can go to past if we travel around the geometry of space time.

I think you're talking about Gödel's Universe, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
11K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K