B Does the Big Bang Expansion Include All Objects in the Universe?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vivek Siddarth K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Expansion
AI Thread Summary
The Big Bang theory describes the universe as continuously expanding, but this expansion does not apply to galaxies or planets. Instead, it refers to the movement of objects that are not strongly bound together, such as galaxy clusters, which gradually move apart over time. Within galaxy clusters, the gravitational forces are strong enough to prevent expansion among galaxies and other solid objects. Therefore, the term "expansion" specifically pertains to the increasing distance between larger cosmic structures. Understanding this distinction clarifies misconceptions about the nature of cosmic expansion.
Vivek Siddarth K
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We all know BigBang theory, which states that the universe is continuously expanding, my doubt is the term expanding, does it mean the expansion of galaxies as a whole or including the planets in it?.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Vivek Siddarth K said:
We all know BigBang theory, which states that the universe is continuously expanding, my doubt is the term expanding, does it mean the expansion of galaxies as a whole or including the planets in it?.
It doesn't mean either one. Galaxies do not expand, nor do the planets. Only constructs larger than galactic clusters "expand" and by "expand" it just means they get farther apart. There are HUNDREDS (probably thousands) of threads on this there on PF. I suggest a forum search.
 
Expansion means that objects which are not bound strongly enough to each other, such as different galaxy clusters, gradually move apart over time. Inside of galaxy clusters, galaxies, planets, and any other 'solid' object, expansion does not occur because the forces holding these objects together is strong enough to resist expansion.
 
  • Like
Likes Vivek Siddarth K
phinds said:
It doesn't mean either one. Galaxies do not expand, nor do the planets. Only constructs larger than galactic clusters "expand" and by "expand" it just means they get farther apart. There are HUNDREDS (probably thousands) of threads on this there on PF. I suggest a forum search.
Thanks for the link... very interesting...
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top