Does the CMB move or is it static?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcJo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb Static
MarcJo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If the CMB is quantum fluctuations of the primordial universe, I would expect it to move, not be static like a photograph. Quantum fluctuations do not hold still, nor has time itself seem to have dilated to the point where it would look constant.

Can somebody take a movie of it and see? All that we see is the famous photograph, but no one has seen the motion picture.

Thanks,

Marcjo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarcJo said:
If the CMB is quantum fluctuations of the primordial universe, I would expect it to move, not be static like a photograph. Quantum fluctuations do not hold still, nor has time itself seem to have dilated to the point where it would look constant.

Can somebody take a movie of it and see? All that we see is the famous photograph, but no one has seen the motion picture.

Thanks,

Marcjo

At a distance of dozens of billions of light years, just how fast would any part of it have to be moving in order for us to see visible movement in the few decades we have been observing?


Hint: it is difficult enough for us to visually detect movement of stars in our own galaxy, some millions of times closer.
 
We are looking at CMB photons that were separated by by much closer distances, when the universe was only 380,000 years old. I would expect much more motion than the stars, which don't seem to move on day to day human time scales. How much motion, I don't know.
 
MarcJo said:
We are looking at CMB photons that were separated by by much closer distances, when the universe was only 380,000 years old. I would expect much more motion than the stars, which don't seem to move on day to day human time scales. How much motion, I don't know.
The point is, at a distance of 14 billion light years, things would have to be traveling at outrageous speeds for their motion to be visible at all over such a short time frame.

What is the angle of a triangle whose short side is .5 light years wide and 14 billion light years long? That is the angle an object would subtend traveling at .5c over one year.
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Back
Top