Does the color of a hot body depend on its composition ?

AI Thread Summary
The color of a hot body does depend on its material composition, particularly at temperatures around 550 degrees Celsius. Metals like steel, stainless steel, titanium, and copper will generally appear similar in color due to their shared electronic structures, which produce similar emission spectra when heated. The apparent color can also be influenced by the body's emissivity and reflectivity, meaning that a material's color at high temperatures may not directly correspond to its thermal emissions. Additionally, thermochromic materials can exhibit significant color changes with temperature variations. Overall, while there are commonalities in the appearance of heated metals, specific characteristics can alter their emitted color.
bksree
Messages
75
Reaction score
2
Hi
Does the color of a hot body depend on its material composition ? For eg. will bodies made of steel, Stainless steel, Ti, Cu etc. all look red in color if the temperature is ~ 550 deg C ?

TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"material" is quite broad.

In general, "sort of".
Atoms have a characteristic spectrum with dominant lines.
It depends on their electronic structure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_spectrum

The blackbody spectrum occurs under specific conditions.
But those conditions are pretty common.
http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/spectroscopyhow.html

Your examples are not going to be all that different at that temp though - heat them up and see. Metals share their outer electrons across the whole solid as a kind of big tub of charge so they all have very similar spectra under heating. Also heavy elements have more options to emmit from, allowing thermal emmissions ot spread over a wider range of wavelengths.
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/analysis/fires/metcolor.htm
Compare the emmission spectrum of H with Fe in the wikipedia article.

You normally bring out the characteristic colors by EM "pumping" as in florescent lights ... hydrogen is pink, sodium is orange, and mercury is blue-grey.

The bottom line is that you can use the color to work out the temperature.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you can get a body hot enough to radiate significantly at optical frequencies then I think its reflectivity of different frequencies (it's apparent colour) could have an effect on the spectrum of radiation it emits (i.e. radiated colour). After all, emissivity and absorptivity go together, so if the body 'looks green' it will be absorbing reds and blues and reflecting greens. So, if the body were at a 'white hot' temperature reds and blues would then be radiated better than green (making it 'glow' magenta more than white). HOWEVER, at that temperature, the energy levels in the surface molecules would be much modified and their interaction with different frequencies of em would probably be changed. So what I say may not apply at all.
 
bksree said:
Hi
Does the color of a hot body depend on its material composition ? For eg. will bodies made of steel, Stainless steel, Ti, Cu etc. all look red in color if the temperature is ~ 550 deg C ?

TIA

It's probably not what you are thinking of, but there are thermochromic materials that show a wide variation in color with temperature.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermochromism

Aside from that, if the refractive index (and thus the emissivity) varies with temperature, the color of an object will also change with temperature.
 
Andy Resnick said:
It's probably not what you are thinking of, but there are thermochromic materials that show a wide variation in color with temperature.

Got the T shirt! Way back.

Actually, there is mention of heating metals, earlier. The change in surface (reflective) colour of metals (tool steel in particular) when you heat them is a great indication of their temperature and is often used when hardening and tempering etc. but that's at lower than 'red heat'.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top