Does the Drude model predict the emission of em waves?

AI Thread Summary
The Drude model describes electrical conduction through charge carriers accelerated by an electric field, which interact with lattice ions. While unbound charged particles emit electromagnetic waves when accelerated, the model does not predict EM wave emission during steady current flow in a circuit. The drift velocity of electrons is minor compared to their random thermal velocities, leading to negligible radiation from accelerations in typical conditions. Bremsstrahlung may occur, but the energy radiated is likely insignificant due to the low accelerations involved. Ultimately, the Drude model focuses on explaining electric current rather than predicting electromagnetic wave emission.
Farcher
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The Drude model of electrical conduction has the charge carriers being accelerated by an electric field and then interacting with the lattice ions. The cycle is then repeated.
An unbound charged particle if accelerated emits electromagnetic waves.
Does that mean that a prediction of the Drude model is that when a "steady" current flows in a circuit electromagnetic waves will be emitted and does that happen in practice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Something to bear in mind is that the drift velocity is superimposed on a far larger random velocity. The acceleration of free electrons when they hit ions (in a Drude type model) will be present whether or not a current is flowing. Presumably there should be bremsstrahlung; I can only assume the energy radiated is insignificant because the accelerations aren't large enough; the thermal speeds of electrons at room temperature are in the order of 105 m s-1 whereas 100 keV electrons in an X-ray machine have speeds of greater than 108 m s-1.
 
The drude model itself doesn't predict the emission of EM waves, it's just trying to explain electric current. But the more general rules of electromagnetism do.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top