Accelerating charge emits em waves or pulse

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around whether an accelerating charge, specifically an electron in a magnetic field, emits electromagnetic (em) waves or just a pulse. Participants explore the implications of classical logic and various radiation phenomena, including synchrotron radiation and wiggler radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that classical logic indicates an accelerating charge should emit just a pulse due to the absence of oscillation.
  • Another participant specifies the scenario involves an electron in a magnetic field, distinct from synchrotron radiation.
  • A link to the Lienard-Wiechert potentials is provided, which describes the radiation from an accelerating charge, along with Larmor radiation.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the mathematical details and seeks an intuitive understanding, comparing a free electron to an antenna that could create a half-wavelength pulse.
  • Another participant points out that the term "synchrotron radiation" is applicable even if the electron's path is not highly spiral-like.
  • A participant references wiggler radiation as an analogy, suggesting that the radiation may be confined in time and can be described as a pulse, while noting that a light pulse does not necessarily imply a short pulse length.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the radiation from an accelerating charge is a pulse or an em wave, with no consensus reached on the matter.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a lack of understanding of the mathematical concepts involved, which may affect their interpretations. The discussion also highlights the complexity of defining radiation types in different contexts.

God Plays Dice
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Does an accelerating charge, such as one turning a corner emit an em wave or just a pulse? Classical logic dictates it should just be a pulse as there is no oscillation. But which is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me be more specific. An electron in a magnetic field, not synchotron radiation as this is a spiralling electron
 
Sry but I don't understand all those hyroglifics. Just intuitively is a free electron similar to an antenna, where I assume a half wavelength pulse can be created or is it a different case
 
God Plays Dice said:
Sry but I don't understand all those hyroglifics
Then in the future please mark your threads as "B" instead of "I". The math in that link is standard vector calculus from undergraduate level physics.

I have updated this thread for you.
 
God Plays Dice said:
Classical logic dictates it should just be a pulse as there is no oscillation. But which is it?
Taking the case of wiggler radiation as an analogy to the kind of motion you are considering, a Wiki link (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggler_(synchrotron)) says "A wiggler has a broader spectrum of radiation than an undulator". This suggests that the radiation is indeed confined in time, or is commonly referred as a pulse. By the way, light pulse does not necessarily implies that the pulse length is short enough such that one cycle of the carrier frequency cannot be covered. A pulse is usually described as an oscillation under a localized envelope.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K