Does the gravity constant change?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the gravitational constant changes over time due to the universe's expansion, with a prevailing consensus that it remains constant. The Brans-Dicke theory suggests a potential variation, which could have severe implications for applied sciences, particularly affecting communication satellites and orbital mechanics. Participants highlight that significant changes in gravity could lead to unpredictable consequences, such as altered stellar evolution and destabilized planetary orbits. The conversation also references a paper proposing a varying Newton constant, emphasizing the complexities and bizarre outcomes that could arise from such changes. Overall, the stability of the gravitational constant is crucial for maintaining the current understanding of physics and the functioning of technology.
Rader
Messages
765
Reaction score
0
Does the gravity constant change slightly over time due to the expansion of the universe?

What would be the consequences to applied science if it did?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The general consensus is that it don't change, but there always people trying to go against the mainstream; if not science would be very boring, don't you think? :redface:
One of the theories that postulates a variation of Newton Constant in space and time is Brans-Dicke theory.
What would be the consequences to applied science if it did?
You can imagine it: bad. Imagine a varying Newton constant in the vicinity of Earth. How positive can be it for our network of communication satellites?

This paper is interesting as postulates a varying Newton constant
Rippled Cosmological Dark Matter from Damped Oscillating Newton Constant
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409059
Saludos
 
Not exactly as phrased. Expansion weakens the tug between distant objects merely by increasing distance [gravity follows the inverse square rule like other forces]. Variations in gravity over time would have a lot of pretty weird effects, assuming the variance was more than trivial. Stellar evolution would be goofy, orbits would would be messed up, as meteor noted, even really weird stuff like a black hole unforming - I can't really even imagine what that would look like.
 
when the universe was created set values for, speed of light, gravity etc etc were all specific. They may change but it would either pull the planets into the sun or send them flying out into space.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top