Medical Does the human eye have a refresh rate ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the human eye has a "refresh rate" similar to electronic devices. Participants explain that the eye and brain process visual information continuously but also take rapid "snapshots," with a commonly accepted timeframe of about 1/10 of a second for perceiving motion. This concept relates to persistence of vision, which allows us to see continuous motion in media like film and television, typically at frame rates of 24 to 30 frames per second. Some contributors mention that certain light frequencies can create the illusion of constant illumination, while others argue that the perception of motion, such as a spinning wheel appearing to rotate backward, is influenced by factors like flickering light and brain processing. There is debate about the physiological mechanisms involved, with some suggesting complex interactions between the eyes and brain, while others emphasize that the eye does not function like a camera and does not have a defined refresh rate. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of visual perception and the physiological processes that underlie it.
BAnders1
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Does the human eye have a "refresh rate"?

This question probably seems ridiculous, but I have no background in physiology and I cannot find anything discussing it online or in my roommate's physiology textbook.

I was wondering if anyone here knows whether the eye and brain processes information continuously, or if it takes rapid "snapshots."
 
Biology news on Phys.org


Sort of, yes. It's about 1/10 of a second. It's why we can see a flipbook of discrete doodles as if it is continuous motion. And why TV works (1/25th second), and why fluorescent lights seem to be continuous (1/60th second).

Read up on persistence of vision. (A quick pre-emptive search shows that, while it seems there's a bit of debate about the actual mechanism for the effect, the 1/10 second rule still seems to apply.)
 
Last edited:


I wouldn't call persistence of vision a "refresh rate". Our vision is more like a continuous signal that takes a finite time to respond to changes.
 


I don't know enough about the physiology, but the reason that a standard TV refreshes at 30 frames per second is because that is about the slowest rate at which continuous motion is perceived.
I do know, due to my weapons design hobby, that a light flashing at 16 pulses per second is interpreted by the visual cortex as being constantly 'on'. The rest of the brain, though, recognizes the individual flashes. It's weird, but it can sure come in handy if you want to mess with someone. :biggrin:
 


yes, there is something to it. it's why a spinning spoked wheel can appear to be rotating backwards, aliasing. and yes, it happens in real life, too, not just a film artifact.
 


Danger said:
I do know, due to my weapons design hobby, that a light flashing at 16 pulses per second is interpreted by the visual cortex as being constantly 'on'. The rest of the brain, though, recognizes the individual flashes.

That sounds way too slow to me...my current monitor does not that low so I can't double check this but I'm pretty sure I can see flickering on 60 hz monitors
 


Proton Soup said:
yes, there is something to it. it's why a spinning spoked wheel can appear to be rotating backwards, aliasing. and yes, it happens in real life, too, not just a film artifact.

Right. There is some kind of complex multiplexing that occurs in the brain and/or that ganglia between the eyes & brain, which is unrelated to the persistence of vision--which is mostly just a lag in the chemical reactions in the retina. My theory is that its something like a vortex scan, where the vortex spins faster near the fovea. I get opthalmic migraines (migraines with the pre-aura but no pain afterwards, thank goodness), and the blind spot always has a definite periodic jagged shimmering around its edge.
 


Thank you all for responding. Best wishes =)
 


Proton Soup said:
yes, there is something to it. it's why a spinning spoked wheel can appear to be rotating backwards, aliasing. and yes, it happens in real life, too, not just a film artifact.

Wait, What??
This is not true.
In daylight you will not see spokes going backwards, you will only see a blur.
When lit by artificial light the light will act as a stroboscope and this will trigger the effect.

Wave your hand in sunlight and notice that the blur is not composed of separate overlaying 'snapshots' of your hand (well, in the corners where your hand effectively stops it might seem that way, in fact you just get a longer exposure time for the hand and a less transparent image is formed.).
In case there was a 'refresh rate' in the eyes you would see separate transparant versions of your hand overlayed instead of the blur.

Your eyes are not camera's!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top