Does the Initial Energy Affect the Final Energy in a Central Force System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two particles connected by a string, where one particle moves on a table and the other hangs below a hole. The participants are exploring the conservation of energy and angular momentum in a central force system, specifically questioning how initial energy affects final energy in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive an expression for the motion of the particles using energy conservation and angular momentum principles. They express uncertainty about their initial energy calculation and its implications on the final energy expression.
  • Some participants question the validity of the initial energy expression, particularly regarding the inclusion of gravitational potential energy.
  • Others suggest reconsidering the assumptions made about the initial conditions and the gravitational energy involved when one particle falls through the hole.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's approach and questioning the assumptions made. There is a focus on clarifying the role of gravitational energy and the implications of the initial setup, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the gravitational potential energy term may have been overlooked in the initial energy calculation. There is also a mention of the conditions under which the hanging particle does not pass through the hole, indicating a need for further exploration of the energy conditions for bounded orbits.

iSY
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've spent quite a while trying to figure this out but can't quite seem to get there... any ideas?

1. The Question
Two particles of mass m are connected by a light inextensible string of length l. One of the particles moves on a smooth horizontal table in which there is a small hole. The string passes through the hole so that the second particle hangs vertically below the hole. Use the conservation of energy and angular momentum to show that:

[tex] <br /> {\dot{r}}^2 = \frac{gl + {v}^2}{2} - \frac{{l}^2{v}^2}{8r^2} -g r<br /> [/tex]

where r(t) is the distance of the first particle from the hole, A and B are constants and g is the acceleration due to gravity. [Hint: Use polar coordinates in the plane of the table with the origin at the hole].

Given that the particle on the table is a distance l/2 from the hole and is moving with a speed v, directed perpendicular to the string, find the condition that the particle below the table does not pass through the hole. [Ans: [tex]\inline {v}^2 \leq 4gl/3[/tex]]

What would happen if: [tex]\inline {v}^2 \leq gl/2[/tex]?

2. My attempt at a solution
I managed to get a similar expression. Assuming the mass is traveling at a speed v on the table:
[tex]E_i = \frac {1}{2} m {v}^2[/tex]
and the angular momentum is:
[tex]L_i = m v \frac {l}{2}[/tex]
I'm not sure if this is valid, but it seemed to work.

Then I got the final energy as:
[tex]E_f = 2(\frac{1}{2}m {\dot{r}}^2) + \frac{{L}^2}{2 m {r}^2} -mg(l-r)[/tex]

Then substituting for the angular momentum and setting the initial and final energies equal I get:

[tex]{\dot{r}}^2 = gl + \frac{{v}^2}{2} - \frac{{(vl)}^2}{8{r}^2} -gr[/tex]

So I'm out by a half for the g*l term. I'm sure this has something to do with the intial energy but I can't explain why.

For the second part I assume the orbit must be bounded, so the Energy must be less than zero, but I cannot seem to get the answer stated.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression for the initial energy doesn't include a term for gravitational energy. mg(l-r) is not 0 when r = l/2.
 
I thought that there would be no gravitational energy initially if both particles are at the plane of the table. Then when one fall through the halls its change in height is -(l-r). Could this be where my assumption is wrong?
 
well it says "Given that the particle on the table is a distance l/2 from the hole". The other particle must be l/2 below the hole. Having the string started in a non-stretched position and the particle falling down until the string is stretched is problematic because the collision after the particle falls is probably unelastic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K