Does the moon have greater gravitational force than the Sun on the Earth?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational forces exerted by the Moon and the Sun on the Earth, particularly in relation to their effects on tidal forces. Participants explore the calculations of gravitational force and the distinction between gravitational and tidal forces, addressing both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the gravitational forces between the Sun and the oceans (8.37 x 10^18 N) and the Moon and the oceans (4.65 x 10^16 N), suggesting the Sun has a greater force.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the gravitational force from the Sun is greater, tidal forces depend on the gradient of gravitational force, which varies with the inverse cube of the distance.
  • There is a discussion about the meaning of "gradient of gravitational force" and why tidal forces are inversely proportional to the cube of the distance.
  • A participant questions the calculations of gravitational force and provides their own values, indicating a discrepancy in the results based on different mass considerations.
  • Another participant suggests that the original calculations may have used the mass of the oceans instead of the Earth, which could explain the differences in force values.
  • There is a mention of the mathematical treatment of tidal forces and the derivative of gravitational force, with one participant expressing uncertainty about the simplicity of their approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the gravitational force from the Sun is greater than that from the Moon, but they disagree on the implications for tidal forces and the calculations involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact calculations and interpretations of tidal forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions made in their calculations, particularly regarding the masses used and the definitions of gravitational versus tidal forces. There are also unresolved mathematical steps related to the treatment of tidal forces.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in gravitational physics, tidal forces, and the mathematical relationships involved in these concepts.

tunakdude
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm going nuts trying to figure this out... in textbooks and online, everything i read says that the moon and Earth have a much stronger gravitational force between them than the sun and the earth, and this is why the moon has greater effect on tides than the sun. They all say that this is because the moon, though much less massive than, is much closer to the Earth than the sun.

But... every time i do the calculations using the G(m1)(m2)/r^2, i get that the force between the Sun and the oceans is 8.37 x 10^18 N, and the force between the Moon and the oceans is 4.65 x 10^16 N

so my calculations say that the Sun has a greater force on the oceans than the moon... if i changed out the value of the oceans' mass with the Earth's mass, i still get that the sun has a greater gravitational pull on the Earth than the moon...

so why do all my sources say that the earth-moon gravitational force is greater?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are confusing the gravitational force with tidal forces. The gravitational force varies with the inverse square of the distance between two bodies. Tidal forces result from the gradient of the gravitational force and thusly vary with the inverse cube of the distance. So while the gravitational force exerted by the sun on the Earth is much greater than that exerted by the moon, the situation is reverse for tidal forces.
 
tunakdude said:
But... every time i do the calculations using the G(m1)(m2)/r^2, i get that the force between the Sun and the oceans is 8.37 x 10^18 N, and the force between the Moon and the oceans is 4.65 x 10^16 N
That equation gives you the gravitational force between the bodies, but that's not the tidal force. The tidal force depends on the change in gravitational strength at different points: It's the variation in pull on one side of the Earth compared to the pull on the other that creates the tidal force. The tidal force is inversely proportional to the distance cubed.

Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tide.html#mstid"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
D H said:
You are confusing the gravitational force with tidal forces. The gravitational force varies with the inverse square of the distance between two bodies. Tidal forces result from the gradient of the gravitational force and thusly vary with the inverse cube of the distance. So while the gravitational force exerted by the sun on the Earth is much greater than that exerted by the moon, the situation is reverse for tidal forces.

thank you very much for the response...

but now i must ask, what is the "gradient of gravitational force" ??

why do you cube instead of square?
 
Doc Al said:
That equation gives you the gravitational force between the bodies, but that's not the tidal force. The tidal force depends on the change in gravitational strength at different points: It's the variation in pull on one side of the Earth compared to the pull on the other that creates the tidal force. The tidal force is inversely proportional to the distance cubed.

Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tide.html#mstid"

ah, this makes good sense to me...
so tell me, do we see the moon having a greater periodic effect on tides than the sun because as the points on the Earth vary frequently with the moon, they experience a greater relative distance change with the moon than with the sun?

i thought that while searching around, i had read sources saying that gravitational force was greater, but they must have all said "tide-generating" potential or something like that (as does the Earth science textbook sitting in front of me)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tunakdude said:
why do you cube instead of square?

Because gravity in our universe is a three dimensional concept (4 but let's ignore time). Squaring would be x*x but gravity is divided into three dimensions, not two.
 
Not really, no. What you are saying implies that Newton's gravitational force equation itself should be a cube function, but it isn't. And the tidal force equation comes simply from the derivative of that equation, since it is just the difference between two different gravitational forces: F1-F2=dF
 
First of all, hello, this is my first post in this forum.
Second, excuse me everybody for opening such an old thread, but I have a question regarding Tidal forces.
How exactly did the OP come to 8.37 x 10^18 and 4.65 x 10^16 N respectively?
When I calculate the gravitational force of the Sun and of the Moon on the Earth I always get -3.5436^22 and -1.9830*10^20 rounded.
I`m using
b65000f8f887a68545ce63eb1cada232.png
 
  • #10
They are probably using the mass of the oceans rather than the mass of the Earth.
If you are just comparing forces it doesn't matter - it would be easier to compare the force on 1kg at the Earth

edit: if you use 1.37E21kg as the mass of the oceans it comes out about those numbers
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Oh, I see. The second part of this particular problem wants me to show that the difference in gravitational force on both sides of the Earth is dF = (-2dr/r)*F.
I started at first using this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_force#Mathematical_treatment , but it`s actually about acceleration and doesn`t get the job done. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. :)

I mean simply calculating the derivative of the force gives the required result, but that seems too simple to me. Can it be?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K