Does the pilot's claim credible?

  • Thread starter franz32
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolves around the claim of a pilot that he can navigate a plane without engines by inducing a charge in the body of the plane to create a magnetic force. The other participants express doubt and point out flaws in the theory, questioning the pilot's understanding of basic principles. They also discuss how to respond to the pilot's claim in a respectful manner.
  • #1
franz32
133
0
Is it possible that the claim of the pilot is true that he can sue the Earth's field to navigate in air in a plane without engines?

He will induce a charge in the body of the plane, so that a force of magnetic origin is exerted on the plane, because the charge that is moving in a magnetic field experience a force. If the force is large to counter the weight... the plane "floats"...

But I think this may be possible. But maybe if he could induct lots of charge on the plane
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Do Not Invest Any Of Your Money In His Scheme.
 
  • #3
Your pilot seems anstonishing ignorant of some basic notions - like air drag and gravity to say nothing of Ohm's Law and the principle of Energy Conservation. How DID he get his pilot's license? Oh, wait, he's into a new business now!
 
  • #4
Tide said:
Your pilot seems anstonishing ignorant of some basic notions - like air drag and gravity to say nothing of Ohm's Law and the principle of Energy Conservation. How DID he get his pilot's license? Oh, wait, he's into a new business now!

I'd rather not insult, and tell him nicely what is wrong with his theory.
 
  • #5
Mk said:
I'd rather not insult, and tell him nicely what is wrong with his theory.

Do you have any reason to think he would understand your explanation?

In any case, Tide's response was not directed to the author of the theory.
 

1. Is there any evidence to support the pilot's claim?

This is a crucial question when evaluating the credibility of the pilot's claim. As a scientist, it is important to look for evidence that supports the claim. This could include data, experiments, or observations that can be replicated by others. Without evidence, the claim cannot be considered credible.

2. Are there any conflicting or alternative explanations for the claim?

It is important to consider other possible explanations for the pilot's claim. As a scientist, it is necessary to critically analyze the claim and evaluate whether there are any other factors that could have influenced the outcome. This can help determine the validity of the claim and whether it can be considered credible.

3. Has the pilot's claim been peer-reviewed?

Peer review is a crucial step in the scientific process. It involves having other experts in the field review and evaluate the claim for accuracy and validity. If the pilot's claim has not been peer-reviewed, it may be difficult to determine its credibility.

4. Has the pilot's claim been replicated by other scientists?

Replication is an important aspect of the scientific process. It involves repeating the experiment or observation to see if the same results are obtained. If the pilot's claim has been replicated by other scientists, it adds to its credibility. However, if it has not been replicated, it may be necessary to question the validity of the claim.

5. Are there any potential biases or conflicts of interest that could affect the pilot's claim?

Scientists must consider the potential biases or conflicts of interest that could influence the pilot's claim. For example, if the pilot works for a company that could benefit from the claim being accepted, it may raise questions about the objectivity of the claim. It is important to consider all possible factors that could affect the credibility of the claim.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
660
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
705
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
5K
Back
Top