Does the pointing vector theory hold true for DC current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gkangelexa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the behavior of current in electrical circuits, specifically addressing the misconception that current is "used up" by devices like light bulbs and heaters. Participants clarify that current, defined as the flow of electrons, remains constant throughout a closed circuit, as per Kirchhoff's Current Law. The energy consumed by electrical devices is converted into other forms, such as heat or light, but the actual flow of electrons does not diminish. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between current and energy, asserting that while energy is dissipated, the current itself is not depleted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law
  • Basic knowledge of electrical circuits and components
  • Familiarity with concepts of voltage, current, and resistance
  • Knowledge of energy conversion in electrical devices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Kirchhoff's Current Law in detail
  • Learn about Ohm's Law and its applications in circuit analysis
  • Explore the principles of energy conversion in electrical appliances
  • Investigate the role of resistance in electrical circuits and its impact on current flow
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, electricians, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamentals of electrical circuits and the behavior of current in practical applications.

  • #61
Let me ask of you this. Can you explain how it works WITHOUT using either of the terms energy or power? Neither of them really explain anything to me. (And I don't think they either of them can "flow" since they aren't physical objects)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Drakkith said:
Let me ask of you this. Can you explain how it works WITHOUT using either of the terms energy or power? Neither of them really explain anything to me. (And I don't think they either of them can "flow" since they aren't physical objects)

Firstly, is anything, a truly 'physical object' except in as far as you can sort of identify it as having a localised region of influence? Is the wave function of an electron when it's in a bound state 'really' a physical object?

If someone 'generates' some Power in a Power Station and someone uses that Power in their home then something can be said to have 'flowed' from A to B.

Surely this thread can't get us anywhere because all we are doing is comparing various models, some of which are better than others.
 
  • #63
sophiecentaur said:
Firstly, is anything, a truly 'physical object' except in as far as you can sort of identify it as having a localised region of influence? Is the wave function of an electron when it's in a bound state 'really' a physical object?

If someone 'generates' some Power in a Power Station and someone uses that Power in their home then something can be said to have 'flowed' from A to B.

Surely this thread can't get us anywhere because all we are doing is comparing various models, some of which are better than others.

We can start by using terms that actually describe something useful. Saying power flows through the line says absolutely nothing about what is occurring unless you already know how it works. And please, spare the "is anything truly physical" BS.
Surely this thread can't get us anywhere because all we are doing is comparing various models, some of which are better than others.
How else would you get to the answer? Comparing models and asking questions about them seems like a very good way to learn.
 
  • #64
"The answer"?
I think this thread is not about answers as much as 'use mine'. But I suppose that goes for many of our threads.
The question of whether or not Power flows 'through' or 'along' or 'because the line is there' is one of those 'really' questions. Without some current flowing, there is no power transfer and so it seems to be reasonable to associate the two. I did wonder about the comment on the Power being due to magnetic fields - that doesn't take the transmission voltage into account or the fact that DC through a Transformer winding (high B field) would, somehow, be different from power along a straight wire of the same resistance.

I do agree that the 'pushing electrons through' / quasi hydraulic idea has to be dodgy.
 
  • #65
Without some current flowing, there is no power transfer and so it seems to be reasonable to associate the two.
Which is why I am asking to avoid talking about energy or power. Neither of those terms refer to anything specific, but only to the overall effect. I KNOW power flows from here to there or whatever, but I don't know how. And I agree that there are no absolute answers, but only answers of varying accuracy.
 
  • #66
sophiecentaur said:
"The answer"?
I did wonder about the comment on the Power being due to magnetic fields - that doesn't take the transmission voltage into account or the fact that DC through a Transformer winding (high B field) would, somehow, be different from power along a straight wire of the same resistance.

That comment led me to think about a simple experiment which can hopefully test the validity of the pointing vector theory for a dc current.
However I will start a new thread because it’s drifting to far from the op. Hope to see you and Drak back in the general section.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K