Does the Probability Question Involve Conditional Probability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nesan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dice Probability
nesan
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Two dice are rolled. What is the probability that the first die is a perfect square and the second die is a 4?


First die : 2/6

Second die : 1/6

Won't the probability be just (2/ 6) * (1 / 6) = 2 / 36 = 1 / 18

My answer says 3 / 6 but aren't these events not mutually exclusive? :|
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The wording is critical. If the question actually reads "that one is a four and the other a perfect square" then the answer is 3/36. This is because the order doesn't matter now, so the possible rolls are 1, 4; 4, 1; 4, 4. As soon as you discriminate the dice as first, second, it collapses to 2/36.
 
nesan said:
Two dice are rolled. What is the probability that the first die is a perfect square and the second die is a 4?


First die : 2/6

Second die : 1/6

Won't the probability be just (2/ 6) * (1 / 6) = 2 / 36 = 1 / 18

My answer says 3 / 6 but aren't these events not mutually exclusive? :|

Hi,

The sample space for your question is S={(i,j), i=1,..,6 j=1,...,6} and supposing that the dice are fair, all 36 outcomes have probability 1/36 of occurring.

E is the event: the first dice is a perfect square and the second is a 4.

E={(1,4),(4,4)}.

So P(E)=2/36=1/18 and not 1/2.

If we think about it, if we roll the dice let's say 100 times, we would not expect to get a perfect square for the first dice together with a 4 for the second dice around 50 times.

Does your question involve conditional probability?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top