Does the shape of a container affect the heat required to melt ice inside it?

AI Thread Summary
The shape of a container does affect the heat required to melt ice inside it, despite the mass of ice being the same. While the primary formula for heat involves mass and latent heat of melting, the difference in container height leads to variations in potential energy. This potential energy difference must be considered, as it contributes to the overall heat required, albeit minimally. The effect is small, approximately 1J/kg compared to the significant latent heat of 330 kJ/kg, making it negligible for practical purposes. Ultimately, the conclusion is that while the heat required differs, the impact is minimal.
RingNebula57
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
Hello everyone! I recently saw a problem about some ice in 2 containers. So:
We have 2 vertical cylindrical containers, which have perfect insulating walls, one with surface of the base S and the other one 2S , filled with the same mass of ice. The question is if there is any diffrence between the heat required to melt the ice in the 2 containers.
I would've probably said no , because Heat=(mass ice)*(latent heat of melting), and how the mass is the same then the heat does not differ. But the solution says that the heat required is diffrent , because if we melt all the ice , than it will turn completely into water , and because we have diffrent cross sections of the containters than the heat will differ. They arrived to that conclusion after saying that the diffrence in height between the initial center of mass and final center of mass for both systems differ.Then the diffrences of the potential energies is the 2 systems will differ also. And converting potential energy into heat we have diffrent heats.
And that seem alright too.
So why is my first guess incorrect?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RingNebula57 said:
Heat=(mass ice)*(latent heat of melting)
minus potential energy released in the process. Which is completely negligible for all practical purposes, but yes, it differs between the two containers. 10 centimeters (approximate difference if the ice is 1 or 2 meters high respectively) would give 1J/kg, compared to 330 kJ/kg the effect is 3 parts in a million.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller and RingNebula57
mfb said:
minus potential energy released in the process. Which is completely negligible for all practical purposes, but yes, it differs between the two containers. 10 centimeters (approximate difference if the ice is 1 or 2 meters high respectively) would give 1J/kg, compared to 330 kJ/kg the effect is 3 parts in a million.
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top