Does the spinning of a wheel affect its aging compared to its surroundings?

Warp
Messages
139
Reaction score
15
One of the classical consequences of relativity is that if someone travels far away from Earth and comes back, he would have aged less than people here (acceleration and thus changing frames of reference being the reason.)

So, why wouldn't this work also for shorter distances? If someone runs to the other side of an olympic stadium and back, he would have aged less than me, who stayed stationary. The difference in ages might be a staggeringly small fraction, but still non-zero.

Smaller still, if we have a spinning wheel and look at one point in it, it will first traverse away from an observer and then towards it. Again, one would expect that point to have aged less than the observer.

Therefore if we have a wheel and spin it fast enough, it should start aging measurably less than its surroundings. Is this hypothesis correct?

Could this be theoretically measured?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Warp said:
One of the classical consequences of relativity is that if someone travels far away from Earth and comes back, he would have aged less than people here (acceleration and thus changing frames of reference being the reason.)

So, why wouldn't this work also for shorter distances? If someone runs to the other side of an olympic stadium and back, he would have aged less than me, who stayed stationary. The difference in ages might be a staggeringly small fraction, but still non-zero.

Smaller still, if we have a spinning wheel and look at one point in it, it will first traverse away from an observer and then towards it. Again, one would expect that point to have aged less than the observer.

Therefore if we have a wheel and spin it fast enough, it should start aging measurably less than its surroundings. Is this hypothesis correct?

Could this be theoretically measured?
Yes, the Earth is such a spinning wheel and Einstein predicted exactly the effect you describe in his 1905 paper introducing SR at the end of section 4. Unfortunately, there are also effects due to gravity that compound the measurement but the contribution from the spinning Earth is as predicted.
 
As well some particle accelerators are circular, in effect the particle representing the " spinning wheel and look at one point in it".
Warp said:
Therefore if we have a wheel and spin it fast enough, it should start aging measurably less than its surroundings. Is this hypothesis correct?

Could this be theoretically measured?
Yes, but because there are different velocities for the wheel (centre spins more slowly than outer edge) the wheels "age" becomes a little more difficult to name.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top