Does the Sun's Movement Create a Solar System Vortex Motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of whether the Sun's movement through space creates a vortex motion within the Solar System, rather than merely a gravitational centripetal force. It is noted that while the Sun does move, the planets share a similar angular velocity, suggesting minimal impact on their orbits. The idea of vortex motion is challenged by the nature of space, which is largely empty and lacks the friction necessary for vortex forces to operate effectively. Participants emphasize that without friction, the dynamics of the Solar System cannot be accurately described as a vortex. The conversation concludes that gravitational forces remain the primary explanation for planetary motion in the Solar System.
Shazamuel89
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, I'm new to the Physics Forum, so this is my first post. I heard somewhere that the Sun moves through space at a certain velocity. If that is true, then wouldn't the Solar System be a system of vortex motion, and not simply gravity being a centripetal force holding the planets towards the center? I know that vortex motion creates a pressure that keeps the outside particles going towards the center, so isn't that what the solar system is instead of a simple gravitational centripetal force?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The planets have the same angular velocity around the galaxy as the sun, so the sun's velocity does not much effect the planets.

Vortexes for because there is something to vortex. Space isn't like water circling a drain, for all practical purposes, space is empty. Vortex forces are frictional forces, and there is no friction in space.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top