I Does the Universe's Expansion lead to Critical Mass < 1?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the universe's expansion and its critical density. Initially, ordinary and dark matter were thought insufficient to achieve a flat universe, but dark energy is believed to contribute to the necessary mass-energy equivalence. As the universe expands, the density of ordinary and dark matter remains constant while dark energy's density remains fixed, leading to a decrease in overall mass per unit volume. This raises the question of whether the universe's density could fall below the critical threshold of 1, potentially altering its shape from flat to saddle-shaped. The implications of these changes suggest that the universe's density and critical mass are dynamic and influenced by its expansion.
HappyMonster3000
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
We understand that for the Universe to be flat, the critical mass of everything that has mass must total an omega of 1.0.

At first, with our lack of knowledge regarding dark energy, we thought that the universe that we detected (ordinary matter and dark matter) did not even add up to a third of this critical amount. Yet, the observable universe was found to be flat.

Enter dark energy. Its corresponding mass (I'm making the assumption that this is due to mass-energy equivalence) is thought to bring up the universe's mass up to the critical density needed for a flat universe.

As the universe expands, there is more total dark energy as the amount of volume increases and the density remains constant. Yet, the amount of ordinary matter and dark matter remain the same.

Therefore, as the universe expands, the total amount of mass per unit volume must be decreasing.

So wouldn't that imply that over time, the density of the universe is decreasing to below a density of 1?


Below is a mathematical interpretation of what I'm getting at:

  • Ordinary Matter: 0.04 of Critical Density
  • Dark Matter: 0.24 of Critical Density
  • Dark Energy: 0.72 of Critical Density
In a flat universe:

(0.04 + 0.24 + 0.72) / 1 = 1.00 Flat Universe

Now, let's say that the universe expands to twice its size:

Ordinary matter (0.04) and dark matter (0.24) still have the same amount of mass, but spread over twice the volume. Only dark energy's density is constant, so its mass increases by the corresponding amount (0.74 * 2):

(0.04 + 0.24 + 0.72 * 2) / 2 = 0.02 + 0.12 + 0.72 = 0.86 Saddle Shaped Universe

Is it possible that as the volume of the universe increases, its density (and hence shape) changes so that it's no longer flat, given that no new ordinary matter or dark matter is added?
 
Space news on Phys.org
A constant ##\Lambda## does not imply a constant ##\Omega_\Lambda##. The critical density changes with time as it depends on the Hubble rate.
 
We should know where the Ω function comes.
\Omega_i=\frac{\rho_i}{\rho_c} where ρc is the critical density (those who gives a flat universe) and ρi is the density of what we're considering (matter, dark energy...).
If the universe is flat, the critical density and the density is the same, so Ω=1.
If we write \Omega=\sum{\Omega_i}=\sum{\rho_i}=\rho and we multiply both sides by the Volume, we get that E(t)=\sum{E(t)_i} where E(t) is the energy (equivalent to the matter). So the volume doesn't modify the equation.
Finally we can ask for the energy to be constant. That's the same as do \frac{dE(t)}{dt}=0=\frac{d}{dt}\sum{E(t)_i}=0→\sum{E(t)_i}=0 so, if the sum of the energies of each part of the universe must be zero (and then is needed to exist some negative energy, that's the dark energy). If this happens, he universe is flat.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top