Does This Alternating Series Diverge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter process91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series \(\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n} + (-1)^n}\) diverges due to the failure of absolute convergence and the behavior of its terms. The discussion highlights the application of Leibniz's rule and suggests two approaches for analysis: using asymptotic approximations for large \(n\) and finding a bounding series \(\sum b_n\) where \(b_n \geq a_n\). The series does not meet the conditions for convergence established by Dirichlet's test or Abel's test, confirming its divergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of alternating series and their convergence criteria
  • Familiarity with Leibniz's rule for alternating series
  • Knowledge of conditional and absolute convergence
  • Basic concepts of asymptotic analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Leibniz's rule in detail
  • Explore Dirichlet's test for convergence of series
  • Learn about asymptotic approximations in series analysis
  • Investigate bounding series techniques for proving divergence
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying series convergence, particularly in the context of alternating series and advanced calculus.

process91
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n} + (-1)^n}

Homework Equations


This is in the section covering alternating sequences. Leibniz's rule, conditional/absolute convergence, Dirichlet's test, and Abel's tests were all covered.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know what to apply here, it seems like none of the tests I have learned are applicable. Most of the theorems in this section covered sufficient conditions for convergence, which I can't turn back on themselves RAA to prove that this diverges. Obviously the series does not absolutely converge, and the even terms are greater in absolute value than the odd terms, so it will keep increasing, however I think there's a problem with approaching it this way since it is essentially grouping terms of the infinite sequence within parenthesis, which is not strictly allowed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can try two ways:
1) since you are interested in its behaviour when n is great, you can find an asymptotic approximation and then analyse it with Leibniz's rule;
or
2) you can find a series \sum b_n such that b_n\geq a_n (work on the denominator, trying to eliminate (-1)^n )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K