Does this equation have any solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Petrushka
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation x = e^x has no real solutions but does have two complex solutions: x₁ = -W(-1) and x₂ = -W(-1, -1), where W is the Lambert function. The Lambert function can be complex, and both solutions have nonzero imaginary parts. The discussion highlights that for real numbers, the equation lacks solutions, confirmed by graphical analysis and calculus. Understanding the Lambert function is essential for grasping these complex solutions. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between real and complex solutions in this context.
Petrushka
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
x\multsp =\multsp {{e}^x}

I'm aware there's no real solution, but does any complex solution exist?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes,it has 2 distinct solutions:

x_{1}=-W(-1)

x_{2}=-W(-1,-1)

,where W is the Lambert function.

Daniel.
 
I see. Having read a bit about the Lambert function on Http://www.mathworld.com it doesn't make much sense to me.

Is the following value:

x_{1}=-W(-1)

...a complex number, or something entirely different?
 
You mean a # of nonzero imaginary part...?Yes it is.As u said and as a graph and elementary calculus would show,for real #-s the equation does not have solution.

Daniel.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top