Does This Graph Structure Form a Matroid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jetoso
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining whether a specific graph structure qualifies as a matroid based on its independent sets. A matroid is defined by three properties: the empty set is independent, every subset of an independent set is independent, and there exists an exchange property for independent sets of differing sizes. The proposed graph G=(V,E) has the set S=E, with independent sets defined as acyclic subgraphs containing at most two edges. Examples of such independent sets are suggested as a starting point for analysis. Clarifying these examples may lead to a definitive conclusion about the graph's matroid status.
jetoso
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I would like to know if the following is a matroid:
Matroid: a matroid M on a ground set E is a pair (S, l), where l is a collection of subsets of S (called the independent sets) with the following properties:
1. The empty set is independent.
2. Every subset of an independent set is independent; this is sometimes called the hereditary property.
3. If A and B are two independent sets and A has more elements than B, then there exists an element in A which is not in B and when added to B still gives an independent set; this property is called the exchange property.


1. Let G=(V,E) be an undirected graph. Let the set S=E and the independent sets corresponding to acyclic subgraphs with at most two edges is a subset.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A good point to start with would be a few examples. This also often guides a way to an answer.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top