Does this jump honor the concept of physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion critiques the physics of a jump in the James Bond film "Casino Royale," highlighting issues such as neglecting air resistance and the unrealistic g-forces experienced during landing. Participants note that while the fall appears accurate, the character's ability to withstand the impact suggests superhuman strength. There is mention of the stuntman’s expertise and the possibility of using wires for safety during the jump. Overall, the consensus is that modifications are needed to align the scene more closely with the laws of physics. The conversation emphasizes the importance of realism in action sequences.
crhscoog
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Does this jump honor the concept of physics??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YMQR13ia...
-James Bond: Casino Royale

Explain what is wrong with the action scene and how the segment should be modified so that it honors the laws of physics.

The only thing I can think of is that the producers neglected air resistance and wind.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your like didn't work.
 


You didn't get the full link:



As far as the physics goes, the guy appears to fall at the right rate, but must have super human strength for his legs and body to withstand the g-forces of the landing.

Until now, I didn't think youtube had "trolls" (people who post things to just to create a long discussion).
 
Last edited by a moderator:


I have the movie. I'll have to check the special features again, but the stuntman is some sort of savant with that kind of thing - I think every one of his stunts in that sequence is real and most were done in one take.
 


I think they filmed the first bit of the jump a meter or two of the ground and the landing on the other crane was done with wires to help him fall safely.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top