B Does this paper disprove the possibility of a new universe creation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussed paper raises questions about the creation of new universes through quantum fluctuations and tunneling, particularly in the context of heat death. It suggests that while quantum tunneling can occur to a lower-energy vacuum state, the absence of fluctuations limits the possibility of tunneling to a higher-energy state. The credibility of the paper is debated, with some viewing it as a serious challenge to the "fecund universe" hypothesis, though it contains speculative elements. The discussion emphasizes the need for further exploration of quantum tunneling and its implications in cosmology. Overall, the paper invites critical examination of existing theories regarding universe formation.
Yid
My question has multiple parts, does the following paper:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0298

Disprove the possibility of creation of another universe through quantum fluctuations if heat death occurs?

If it does could another universe still be created through quantum tunneling?

Can quantum tunneling exist without quantum fluctuations in De Sitter Space?

How credible is this paper? Are there any that refute the authors claims?
 
Space news on Phys.org
My general feeling is that it puts the "fecund universe" idea into serious doubt, but there's too much speculation in the paper to be certain. I would consider the paper to be one requiring serious consideration by anybody who is proposing a new idea for how new universes might form.
 
Do you have any knowledge on quantum tunneling? Can it exist without quantum fluctuations?

What is some of the speculation in the paper?

Thanks for the reply.
 
Yid said:
Do you have any knowledge on quantum tunneling? Can it exist without quantum fluctuations?
Quantum tunneling can still exist if it's to a lower-energy vacuum state, if such a state exists. If tunneling to a lower-energy vacuum state were to occur somewhere within our cosmological horizon, the lower-energy vacuum state would spread outward at very close to the speed of light and destroy everything within the original tunneling event's horizon.

Quantum tunneling to a higher-energy state can't exist in this model because there aren't fluctuations that raise energy.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top