I Does Transforming Hermite Polynomials Affect Their Orthogonality?

Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone.

I am working with generalized polynomial chaos. To represent a Normal random variable, the Hermite polynomials are used. However, as far as I understand, these represent N(0,1); if what I have read is correct, if I want to work with any other mean and variance, I shoud simply use the fact that Z=(X-μ)/σ and find the new polynomials (X) substituting the regular ones (Z), which would be: 1, Z, (Z2-1)... which would mean that X1= σZ-μ and X2=σ(Z2-1)-μ...

Can someone please tell me if I am right?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think you are, but it would be interesting to know how the chaos functions react to coordinate transformations.
 
Does your transformation preserve orthogonality? I would think that the requirement of orthogonality would demand zero mean...i.e. for ##i\neq j##$$<\Psi_i \Psi_j>=0$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top