Does U-235's Higher Likelihood of Fission Make It More Useful Than U-238?

  • Thread starter Thread starter textbooks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Neutrons
AI Thread Summary
U-235 is more effective for nuclear fission due to its ability to undergo fission with slow neutrons, forming U-236 and achieving a more stable nucleus. This stability is linked to the arrangement of electron shells, which may contribute to its utility in nuclear reactions. In contrast, U-238 is classified as fertile rather than fissile, meaning it cannot sustain a fission chain reaction like U-235. The discussion also touches on the electron configurations of both isotopes, questioning whether U-238's even atomic number affects its properties similarly. Overall, U-235's higher likelihood of fission makes it significantly more useful in nuclear applications than U-238.
textbooks
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
U-235 is most suitable for bombardment by slow neutrons 'cause it becomes U-236,providing for a more balanced nucleus. So if the electron shells are arranged something like 2,4,8,16,32,18,8,2 the atomic number only changes, in this case, because of an additional neutron. Is this element in a more harmonic state now, is this why it is useful? and U-238; would the same be true simply because it has an even atomic number after bombardment? "Anddoes U-238 have the same electron numbers in their respective shells?
L8R
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Please show some work and attempt to answer one's questions.

What is common among isotopes of any element?

U-235 is one of the fissile or fissionable isotopes, whereas U-238 is considered fertile.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top