Does visible light contain energy?

AI Thread Summary
Visible light does contain energy, which is absorbed and reflected by objects, leading to the colors we perceive. When an object absorbs light, such as a red-painted surface reflecting red wavelengths while absorbing others, it does not violate conservation laws; the absorbed energy is converted to heat. For example, a black object left in sunlight becomes hot due to the energy it absorbs, which is then re-radiated as infrared energy. Over time, objects reach thermal equilibrium, balancing energy absorption and emission. The Earth itself has absorbed solar energy for billions of years, demonstrating the continuous cycle of energy transformation.
tinkeringone
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I read that Infra red waves that are absorbed are emitted by objects. And that makes sense.

But then I read that it apparently works differently in the visible light spectrum, i.e. the visible light colors we see are only those that that aren’t absorbed, i.e. they’re only the ones that are reflected off the surface of an object. So if red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet color waves reach an object that’s painted red, the red is reflected off the object, and all the other colors are absorbed.
Wouldn’t that violate the laws of conservation? Isn’t that energy? If it’s energy, how could it keep going in there and never come back out?
 
Science news on Phys.org
tinkeringone said:
Wouldn’t that violate the laws of conservation? Isn’t that energy? If it’s energy, how could it keep going in there and never come back out?

Leave a black object out in bright sunlight for a few hours... Then touch it. It will be hot. That's where the energy it absorbed has gone.
 
There is nothing different about the energy in light and the energy in IR. If you expose an object to the concentrated (optical) rays of the Sun for a while, its temperature may get so high that it starts to get red / white hot. It is radiating light energy, having absorbed light energy.
The actual wavelength of the radiated EM, depends upon the temperature.

Given long enough, an object will reach equilibrium temperature with its surroundings - when the rate of energy absorption equals the rate of emission. If you took an object and placed it in a perfectly reflecting sphere, along with a filament lamp, that object would end up glowing at the same temperature as the filament. This model is a bit flawed, the way it's stated because the filament temperature would rise uncontrollably without some control of the power supply because no energy would escape from the sphere, but it makes my point.
 
What sophiecentaur said.

Plants convert some of the energy into chemical energy.
Solar panels convert it to electricity.
Most objects just heat up a bit and re-radaite the energy in the infrared part of the spectrum.

PS: Have a think about planet earth. It absorbs quite a lot of light energy from the sun and has done so for billions of years. Where has the energy gone?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top