Does Weak Nuclear Force Run Radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skywolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclei Radiation
skywolf
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Weak nuclear force runs radiation right?
as far as i know it is because of quantum tunneling that particles can get out.
if so, then does it follow the idea that if i watch it, it doesn't happen?
for example shrodingers cat, if he watched the isotope, then is there a 0% chance that he dies?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skywolf said:
Weak nuclear force runs radiation right?
as far as i know it is because of quantum tunneling that particles can get out.
if so, then does it follow the idea that if i watch it, it doesn't happen?
for example shrodingers cat, if he watched the isotope, then is there a 0% chance that he dies?

Ok...sigh...here we go.

First of all, the weak interaction changes the flavour of quarks.

Secondly, only beta decay (and the electromagnetic interaction) is a (elektro-)weak interaction and it is NOT a quantum tunneling process.

Alpha decay is a quantum tunneling process that can be fully described by quantummechanics. Beta decay is described by quantum field theory.

Finaliter, do not attach too much value to this Schrödinger Cat type bull****. I mean, these processes will happen irrespective of whether you "look at them or not". These measurement-type problems are "generated" artificially because of some people's interpretation of the mathematical formalism behind quantummechanics. However, there are as much scientists saying that we should only hold on to the pragmatic view on QM, stating that : if it ain't broken, do not fix it.

regards
marlon
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top