Does work experience count in getting into a top US school?

AI Thread Summary
Work experience can enhance an application for a master's program at top US universities, but it varies by institution and program type. Notably, schools like Stanford and UC Berkeley do not offer terminal master's programs, focusing instead on Ph.D. tracks. Relevant work experience in fields like embedded systems and firmware development is valuable, especially for professional master's programs. However, the reputation of these programs can differ, so research is essential before committing. Ultimately, while a prestigious name can be beneficial, it may not be crucial for career advancement if already employed in the field.
rayamr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have two majors ,one in Physics and the other is Electronics engineering.I have 7 years of work experience in Embedded systems and firmware development. I want to do MS from a reputed US university( like Stanford ,University of California Berkeley etc). Do you think I stand a good chance?I need your opinions. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most of the top schools (including Stanford and Berkeley, who even states that they will not consider students looking to earn a terminal Masters' in their graduate catalog) don't have terminal Masters' programs.

However, if you were applying to a graduate program, relevant work experience would certainly count for something.
 
rayamr said:
Hi,

I have two majors ,one in Physics and the other is Electronics engineering.I have 7 years of work experience in Embedded systems and firmware development. I want to do MS from a reputed US university( like Stanford ,University of California Berkeley etc). Do you think I stand a good chance?I need your opinions. Thanks in advance.

It depends on the type of degree. A lot of schools have masters degree programs for working professionals, but you do have to do your research before spending the money on those degrees. There are situations that I know of in which the school has a big name, but the working professionals program doesn't have a particularly good (or bad) reputation.

Also, if you are already working, then getting a brand name isn't that useful for career purposes.

It also makes a difference if you are in the US. Going to school in the US is a major route for immigration, and if your primary goal is to get into the US, then I wouldn't worry so much about going to a "top" school.
 
fss said:
Most of the top schools (including Stanford and Berkeley, who even states that they will not consider students looking to earn a terminal Masters' in their graduate catalog) don't have terminal Masters' programs.

It depends on the department. Physics departments almost uniformly Ph.D. programs, but there are terminal masters programs, and even terminal masters programs intended for working professionals.
 
twofish-quant said:
It depends on the department. Physics departments almost uniformly Ph.D. programs, but there are terminal masters programs, and even terminal masters programs intended for working professionals.

I didn't say there weren't terminal Masters' programs. However, Berkeley and Stanford do not have terminal Masters' programs, and it's uncommon for a "top school" to have such a program. Harvard does, but a small sampling of the top physics institutions (the two mentioned above plus MIT, Caltech, Princeton, Cornell, UChicago, and even some larger state schools like UMich, Univ. Illinois Urbana-Champaign) yields very few MA or MS programs.
 
fss said:
Harvard does, but a small sampling of the top physics institutions (the two mentioned above plus MIT, Caltech, Princeton, Cornell, UChicago, and even some larger state schools like UMich, Univ. Illinois Urbana-Champaign) yields very few MA or MS programs.

I think we were reading the OP's question in a different way. It wasn't clear to me whether or not the OP was referring just to MS in physics, or if he was interested in getting a masters degree in a related field. Stanford and Berkeley offer MS in financial mathematics.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top