Does your understanding of Quantum mechanics complete

AI Thread Summary
Understanding quantum mechanics is a complex journey that often begins with an undergraduate course but continues to evolve over years, potentially extending into graduate studies and beyond. Initial exposure in undergraduate classes may provide a foundational grasp, estimated at about 55% of a "perfect" understanding, which may suffice for research fields that occasionally reference quantum mechanics. Graduate-level courses can enhance this understanding to around 75%, enabling students to engage with quantum-heavy literature. However, many find that their comprehension diminishes when tackling advanced topics, such as field theory, indicating that mastery of quantum mechanics is an ongoing process. The choice of textbooks also plays a significant role in shaping understanding, with some resources proving more effective than others. Overall, persistence in studying quantum mechanics is essential, as deeper insights often come with time and continued learning.
noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0
... after you've taken your first undergrad course in quantum mechanics? Or does it take years , perhaps even well after you've earned your pHd in physics , for your understanding of the basic and advanced principles of quantum mechanics to be complete? Too hard to tell for me, but if I only paid attention to how my professor teaches quantum mechanics and not fully sought after any other QM book that presents QM in a entirely different fashion from the way the professor presents it, my understanding of QM would not be compete even if I passed my professor's class.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
noblegas said:
if I only paid attention to how my professor teaches quantum mechanics and not fully sought after any other QM book that presents QM in a entirely different fashion from the way the professor presents it, my understanding of QM would not be compete even if I passed my professor's class.

This true of many things, not just quantum mechanics.
 
Hmm, that's an interesing question. My best guess is that if you normalize to 1 being "perfect" understanding, then an undergrad course will put you at about .55. This is usually good enough if you're doing research that isn't heavily quantum mechanical, but which may once in awhile refer to it (i.e. particle astrophysics, biophysics, etc.) A year of graduate quantum will put that up at .75, which I think is enough to read papers that are quantum-heavy. This is usually a good idea if you're in high energy or (especially) condensed matter.

Of course, I'm taking field theory right now, and I feel like I'm back down to .05. So maybe something is wrong with my model.
 
If a one-semester undergraduate course in QM gave a complete understanding of the subject, why would graduate students have to take two semesters of it? :confused:
 
It's been close to two decades since I took my first quantum mechanics class, and it's one of those things that the more I learn about it, the less I think I really understand it.
 
depends which book your class is taught from.

those who read from Cohen-Tannoudji are better off than those who read from griffiths
 
I'm halfway through my first semester of graduate QM and only now are things starting to come together a little bit.It takes a while, but don't let that deter you from continuing your study of the subject. It's well worth it!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top